August 2011 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Gas Detection (1 of 2)
Always check to see the guidelines that any particular municipality follows, or solicit the advice of your “local expert”! |
|
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Basic Principles
In this, part one of a two-part series on gas detection, we’ll discuss
basic principles and lay down the groundwork for the second part of the
series, which will deal with the technologies of gas detection and the
practical implementation of gas detection systems. I suppose in order
to understand what we’re detecting and how/why we’re doing it, we need
a fundamental knowledge on the properties of hazardous gases,
concentration levels, and exposure limitations. So I give you…Part One:
Gas Hazards
There are three types of gas hazards that we’re typically concerned
with: flammable gas hazard, toxic gas hazard, and asphyxiant gas
hazard. Of the three, we’ll spend most of the time during this series
discussing and dealing with the first two. Not to say that the third is
any less of a concern in terms of safety, but covering the basics of
the first two will go a long way in covering the third.
Flammable Gas
Hazard: Combustion is the defining term for this hazard.
In order for combustion to take place, three factors must be present:
fuel (gas), oxygen, and a source of ignition. Think about lighting a
propane grill. You turn the fuel on, strike the igniter, wave your hand
over the grill (careful!) and whoosh, you have your flame.
There is a range of gas-to-air concentration that will result in a
combustible mixture. Not enough gas and the mixture is considered too
lean. Not enough oxygen (too much gas) and the mixture is too rich.
Like the carburetor in your automobile; flood it with fuel and try to
start it (good luck with an older model!). The range of concentration
that results in a combustible mix is defined by an upper and lower
limit. The upper limit is referred to as the Upper Explosive Limit
(UEL) and the lower limit is referred to as, you guessed it, the Lower
Explosive Limit (LEL).
In monitoring for flammable gas hazards, we’re generally establishing
two alarm levels. Reaching the first alarm level would have the effect
of turning on a ventilation system, so as to forcefully remove the gas
from the air and bring the concentration back down to a safe level.
This is established as a percentage of the LEL, typically around 25%.
Reaching the second alarm level would indicate that the ventilation
system has either malfunctioned or the concentration of flammable gas
has exceeded the capabilities of the ventilation system. In this case
the condition must be annunciated by an audible/visual alarm. The
second alarm level is set at no higher than 50% of the LEL.
Examples of combustible gases, in addition to the two mentioned above
(propane and gasoline fumes) include hydrogen, methane, ammonia, and
oxygen (really!),
Toxic Gas
Hazard: toxic is a synonym for poisonous, as in
life-threatening, as in “that doesn’t smell good, I’m getting out of
here!” Actually, while some toxic gases do have strong odors
associated with them, it is the ones that don’t that tend to be the
most deadly. Carbon monoxide (CO) is, for all practical purposes,
odorless in concentrations that can be lethal. Indeed, more fatalities
occur due to exposure to toxic gases than due to explosions causes by
flammable gases.
Toxic gases are measured in parts per million, or ppm. To define safety
limitations in ppm, we need to discuss a couple of additional terms.
The first, known as Time Weighted Average, or TWA, is the level at
which a person can be exposed to the toxic gas for an eight hour period
of time (40-hour workweek), and not incur any adverse health effects.
The second is the Short Term Exposure level, or STEL. This is the time
weighted average (maximum)
concentration level at which a person can be exposed to the toxic gas
for a fifteen minute period of time without suffering from any adverse
health effects.
So in monitoring for toxic gas hazards, we see that it’s not just the
concentration level in ppm that’s important, but also the amount of
time that one is being exposed to the toxic gas. As with flammable
gases, we typically establish two alarm levels for toxic gas hazards.
The first is set for the TWA. Reaching this level should invoke the
ventilation system, however no audible/visual alarm is required. Just
ventilate the space until the concentration level drops back below the
TWA. The second is set for the STEL. At this point the condition must
be annunciated.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Gases that pose toxic gas hazards, in addition to carbon monoxide,
include nitrogen dioxide (diesel fumes), chlorine, ammonia, and
hydrogen sulfide. To put some values to a couple of these gases, I did
a little product research and found a carbon monoxide and a nitrogen
dioxide detector, made by the same manufacturer. These detectors have
on-board alarm relays, for both activation of a ventilation system, and
annunciation via a separate audible/visual alarm. The ventilation relay
setpoint for the CO detector is 35 ppm (averaged over 5 minutes), and
the annunciation relay setpoint is 200 ppm (after ten minutes). By
contrast, the ventilation relay setpoint for the NO2 detector is
adjustable between .5 and 3 ppm, and the annunciation relay setpoint is
adjustable between 1 and 5 ppm. The important thing to take away from
this is that, always consult an expert in gas detection for your
application, especially when adjustability of an alarm relay is offered.
Asphyxiant Gas
Hazard: An asphyxiant gas is one that can deplete the
level of oxygen in the air. Air that is oxygen-deficient is a hazard
seeing that we as humans need oxygen in the air to live. Simple
asphyxiants deplete the oxygen in the air by displacement; the oxygen
is displaced by the asphyxiant. In small enclosed spaces this can
become a real suffocation hazard. Many refrigerants used in chiller
systems are considered asphyxiants. In a chiller room it is therefore
important to be able to monitor and alarm a high refrigerant level in
the room, perhaps caused by a leak in the refrigerant line. Carbon
dioxide (CO2) at high concentrations is considered an asphyxiant.
Normal outdoor air concentrations of CO2 are typically around 700 ppm,
whereas normal “acceptable” indoor concentrations are under 1,100 ppm.
By contrast, levels reaching upwards of 50,000 ppm will deplete the
oxygen in the air and are considered a threat.
Tip of the Month: Safety
guidelines vary from state to state, and
internationally as well. In the US, there are several organizations
that publish safety guidelines, including the Occupational Safety &
Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for
Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH). Each of these organizations
has its own terminologies that may differ from each other, and from
what’s been written herein. Always check to see the guidelines that any
particular municipality follows, or solicit the advice of your “local
expert”!
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]