December 2013 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
The Good News and Bad News
About Building Efficiency and Our Industry. The good news is that the industry is waking up. However, the bad news is that the industry is waking up.
|
Paul Oswald President, Environmental Systems, Inc (ESI) |
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
ESI has been in the business of building efficiency for over 27 years
and personally, I have been at this for over 32 years… a long
time. From my perspective, it’s good to see that the industry is
finally recognizing that more efficient buildings are possible; the
level of interest has increased as evidenced by the attendance at this
conference (CoRE Tech 2013). So the good news is that the industry is waking
up. However, the bad news is that the industry is waking
up. Bad news because as our industry often does, it over
indulges. The messaging becomes more extravagant with claims of
out-sized savings and software automatically correcting mechanical
issues and magic that just happens. And, there is the
noise. The noise of everyone saying the same thing, promising the
same thing, offering the same savings claims.
Many organizations have already started on their journey to smart
buildings, a higher level of operating efficiency and perhaps most
importantly, bottom line cost savings. I say journey because
that’s what it is; it is not a destination and there is no silver
bullet to get you there. There are examples of
organizations from a variety of different industries that have embarked
on this journey and are seeing significant results.
For example, we recently completed a project with IBM for the GSA; a
project called GSALink. Some statistics about this project:
As part of our scope in this project, we performed site readiness
assessments, installed the data capture technology, and integrated data
from the various building automation systems, the energy meter
database, the owner’s operation database, and weather data. One
of the more significant challenges was resolving naming and tagging
conventions given the diversity of data sources and types. As a
contributor to Project Haystack, we used its' conventions to the extent
that they existed, and provided our own extensions as necessary to
address this challenge. In addition, we provided and installed
the analytics platform, developed the analytics rules and provided
training to the various stakeholder groups.
This scope, from the first site assessment to having data flowing from
the 55 buildings to the analytics platform, was completed in nine
months. We are currently involved in rule tuning and most
importantly, working with the stakeholders at the building level to
effectively use the system to manage their work in order to achieve the
successful result; expressed in terms of energy and operational dollar
savings. More than anything else, this project serves as an
example that it can be done, the technology exists and there are people
who can implement it, even on a large scale such as this and in a short
period of time.
As impressive as the implementation of this project may be, just
implementing it is not going to deliver results. Getting the
stakeholders to embrace it and use it is a key driver for success and
getting organizational alignment is critical. Without this, we
have great technology, implemented successfully, delivering nothing.
While there are early adopters such as the GSA and others that are
actively embracing the concept of analytics and information management
to achieve improved business performance, others are just
beginning to understand what this is all about or worse, are paralyzed
by the noise of similar claims, messages, and apparent
similarity. If you find yourself in this situation I have some
bad news for you; it’s not going away. But don’t let the noise
prevent you from getting started on the journey, you can’t afford
it. Building efficiency is a requirement for today’s competitive
market and it doesn’t matter what industry you’re in; retail,
manufacturing, health care, education, corporate real estate,
government. This isn’t a question of if you should embrace this,
but when.
Whether you’re talking about smart real estate solutions or smart
building solutions, to compete in today’s market requires the
competitive advantage that these solutions deliver. And yes, you
need to sort through the noise to understand that no software on earth
is going to automatically repair a broken damper linkage. But the
good news is that there are companies that can help you with this; you
don’t need to go it alone. But what you cannot afford to do is do
nothing. The cost of no action is just too high; in terms of
financial results, employee retention and attraction, student
enrollment, manufacturing cost and quality, quality of patient care,
whatever your performance metric is.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
As an independent systems integrator, one thing we know to be true;
there are no silver bullets, and there is plenty of technology out
there. We need good technology to be sure, but success in
achieving higher levels of efficiency and truly smart buildings is
about people and process.
In our experience, it is not uncommon when delivering an analytics
solution to find that everyone’s focus is on the technology and they
completely miss the fact that the success of these implementations is
based not on the technology, but on an organization’s readiness to
embrace the process that surrounds it. Too often we see a
lack of commitment to resources, both human and financial, to use the
valuable information provided by the technology to drive successful
outcomes. These solutions are not projects; sure they start that
way, but if we’ve learned anything it’s that successful results are
achieved because of the on-going, continuous process that these
solutions enable; it is about changing how we work and it most
certainly is not a project in the traditional sense with a finite end
point. Treated as such, successful results will be limited at best and
only temporary.
It’s not the technology’s fault or the implementation of it. It
is the failure of organizations to understand and commit to the
processes and work flows that achieve successful outcomes. Simply
put, organizations focus so intently on the technology, that they
completely miss this critical issue. Our industry, which is
hell-bent to sell the next greatest piece of technology, doesn’t focus
on the process and people aspect. It could be because they don’t
get it or it could be the fact that they’re just so used to selling
“things” rather than solutions or more importantly, results.
Current procurement practices don’t help this situation either; they
treat these solutions as a commodity when in fact, it is anything
but. These practices attempt to reduce these solutions to a “unit
cost” price which simply does not make sense and will result in the
project failing to deliver its intended outcome.
As for ESI, we are proud to be part of this industry and are driven to
bring innovation and thought leadership to it. We are firm
believers in leading by example. Our own building for example,
Gateway West, is one of less than 10 buildings worldwide to be
certified LEED double platinum (NC and EB: O&M). Further, it has an
Energy Star rating of 99, the highest of any office building in the
State of Wisconsin. It has been called the most intelligent
building in the world. And yet, despite all of that, and the fact
that the building is less than four years old, we just completed a
complete revamp of our control sequences based on the continuous
analysis of building information. This is the journey; it sets an
example and it gives us a great deal of insight that we bring to our
customer’s solutions. Most importantly, it delivers results.
About Environmental Systems
ESI is a professional services firm providing building efficiency
solutions. Our clients seek our expertise in helping them assemble the
ideal solution that is aligned with the needs of their businesses.
Through thought leadership and innovative services, ESI delivers the
desired results our clients require.
About the Author
Paul Oswald is president of Environmental Systems, Inc (ESI).
Paul has over 30 years of experience in building automation, system
integration and energy management. His experience includes product
strategy and development, business and channel development, and
services.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]