December 2013 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Pneumatic Upgrades The challenge is that simply upgrading from pneumatic to DDC will not necessarily save energy. |
Paul Ehrlich,
Ira
Goldschmidt
& Angela Lewis November
Issue -
BAS Column
|
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Much
of our work involves energy studies and retrofits to commercial
buildings. What we find on these projects are a variety of
control systems, from the original pneumatic systems installed years
ago to the latest DDC systems that are part of an integrated
system. Because of this we are often in a position to advise
owners about upgrading both pneumatic and older DDC systems. The cost
to upgrade these systems is significant, and owners demand to know the
benefits of upgrading in terms of reduced energy expense, improved
comfort, and better tools for operations.
The challenge is that simply upgrading from pneumatic to DDC will not
necessarily save energy; in fact since DDC controls are more accurate,
they can actually use more energy. The solution is to use the new
control sequences for systems optimization that can readily result in
significant energy efficiency. A few examples of these sequences
include improved scheduling, economizer control, static pressure and
discharge air reset. For VAV terminals, the use of DDC allows for
better occupancy control; for reheat boxes it allows the ability to
utilize different minimum flow settings for heating and cooling.
In addition to saving energy, networked control systems are an
essential tool for better building operations, allowing operators to
see what is going on in the space from any place where there is an
Internet connection.
Of course upgrading the controls on a mechanical system is a lot like
renovating an old house. It isn’t so hard to tell when to start
making changes, but often hard to know when to stop. While there
is rarely a question about replacing pneumatic logic, receiver
controllers, indicators and transmitters on many projects it is
tempting to leave in existing pneumatic valve and damper
actuators. We generally recommend replacing pneumatic actuators
with new electronic actuators. These devices have become highly
reliable and provide accurate feedback for improved control. For
control valves we usually will retrofit butterfly valves with new
actuators but it is generally better to replace older globe
valves.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]One of the biggest challenges is the decision about
what to do with VAV
boxes. Leaving the boxes with pneumatic controls makes it
impossible to properly optimize systems and have good visibility into
what is going on in the space. Retrofitting is expensive though
since it requires new controllers, power, network connection, new
thermostats, control valve, and re-balancing at least at the box.
While some boxes can readily be converted to DDC, we find some older
boxes are not able to accept new DDC controls due to the use of
integrated actuators, no flow sensing or the use of mechanical volume
regulators. Even boxes that can readily accept a new DDC
controller are often in such poor condition that they are
problematic. When doing a retrofit, it is recommended to either
have an allowance to repair boxes, or ideally plan to replace the boxes
when upgrading the controls.
A new control system is likely to provide numerous benefits for
improved operations of an existing building, but a new control
system, coupled with systems that are re-designed for efficient
operations can result in better comfort, operability, and energy
savings that can rapidly pay for the investment.
About the Authors
Paul and Ira first worked together on a series of ASHRAE projects
including the BACnet committee and Guideline 13 – Specifying DDC
Controls. The formation of Building Intelligence Group provided them
the ability to work together professionally providing assistance to
owners with the planning, design and development of Intelligent
Building Systems. Building Intelligence Group provides services for
clients worldwide including leading Universities, Corporations, and
Developers. More information can be found at
www.buildingintelligencegroup.com We also invite you to contact
us directly at Paul@buildingintelligencegroup.com or
ira@buildingintelligencegroup.com
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]