Award winning manufacturer of IT-based building automation.
| Fault Detection vs Alarm Monitoring
Rivals or Allies
Philip Desrochers, B.Eng, Co-Founder
ADMS Technologies Inc.
Over the last five years, the demand for intelligent controls in building automation has been growing up significantly with the arrival of governmental energy saving requirements. Software companies developed new applications intended to help building operators find faulty equipment in their systems in order to cut on wasted energy and operation costs. All this lead to a new market opening in fault detection and diagnosis for building control systems, creating new competition for building automation companies. The real question remaining is if fault detection really competes against building automation, or is mixing both a better solution for the customer?
This article explains the fundamentals of both services and demonstrates how, in fact, mixing alarm monitoring with fault detection can generate a very powerful solution to manage building automation systems.
What is a BAS?
First of all, let’s explain what a building automation system (BAS) is and what it does in a building. The BAS is a computerized network of electronic devices meant to control all building systems such as HVAC, lighting, hot water, chilled water, pumps, boiler and all other necessary equipment to generate a perfect indoor environment. It follows programmed logic to create what the building operator wants such as air temperature and humidity.
Most of available BAS systems are available with alarm modules that raise a notification in the BAS software interface, a SMS or an email when a component of the system reaches a critical status. These alarms are binary, meaning they are active or not. They occur only when a unique variable changes or surpasses a specific threshold. For example, a boiler exceeding is maximum temperature meaning that something is not right. These alarms are a really good start at managing the BAS performances, but they limit the facility manager to reactive actions on critical equipment, not being able to see things coming in the system.
In a situation where a mechanical component fails, the BAS compensates
using the rest of the system to still generate the same conditions.
This kind of situation does not trigger an alarm in the BAS, letting
the system run inefficiently increasing operation costs. A good example
is overheating the building supply air because of a faulty cooling coil
or a leaky cooling valve. In this situation, the BAS does exactly what
it is intended to do by changing the system to reach the temperature
set point. No alarm is triggered because the temperature still reaches
the set point, but the system runs at a much higher energy cost.
Fault detection and diagnosis
Fault detection and diagnosis software are exactly intended to prevent these situations. The way it works is simple. It connects to the BAS sensors and data points to identify faulty equipment, inefficient control sequences and other mechanical failures. It enables the manager to be proactive before an alarm is triggered. Moreover, it allows important energy savings and simplifies investigation processes to save tons of time. Broken dampers, leaky cooling valves, wrong sensor calibration and oversized components are all issues hard to find in those complex systems. Using fault detection technology gives access to the right information to measure performance, quickly find discrepancies and make informed decision on how to operate the BAS.
Benefit from joined technology
Using both fault detection and alarm monitoring is the optimum solution to an overall building operation management. It is important to break the paradigm that fault detection is a rival to BAS. In fact, a good fault detection software does not search for errors done by the control system or points that the design is wrong. It analyses the global system integrity helping the automation system to do a better job. It oversees all the sensors to understand how the environment can impact the BAS and points out what could be done to be more efficient. It is obviously more a complementary tool than a rival.
In conclusion, fault detection and diagnosis tools can be a precious asset to companies offering building system maintenance and alarm monitoring. This technology joined with strong experience in control sequences would really benefit every player in the end. It opens a brand new business model to automation and control companies that can now offer more energy monitoring services and also be more competitive with quicker problem solving and stronger analysis. Adopting fault detection in building management is a key strategy for the facility manager to cut on cost, save energy and better use assets. It brings buildings to today’s technology level.
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]