July 2011 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Proactive BAS Alarming
for High Performance Buildings
To start implementing a proactive alarm management process, it is necessary to prioritize the alarms. |
Paul Ehrlich, Ira
Goldschmidt
& Angela Lewis |
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
The
January column (“Alarms Lead to Reactive Operations”) discussed how
alarms result in reactive operations and how predictive control and
fault detection diagnostics can be part of the solution to energy
efficient, high performance building operation. However, another option
is to use a proactive approach to alarms. The following four
steps are suggested:
1.
Prioritize all alarms, considering risk and priority
2. Provide the operators with actionable steps to
resolve the alarms
3. Verify that an alarm has been properly resolved
after a specified time interval
4. Acknowledge operators who properly resolve alarms
To start implementing a proactive alarm management process, it is
necessary to prioritize the alarms. Criteria to consider when
prioritizing alarms include risk and priority of the equipment,
considering the core mission of the organization. Categories such
as life safety, occupant comfort/productivity and energy efficiency may
be a possible prioritization strategy.
When an alarm occurs, instead of the status quo – receipt of an email,
message on your PDA or popup on a computer screen stating the alarm has
occurred, the building operator would be notified of the alarm along
with a step-by-step procedure to resolve the alarm. For
organizations with some form of computerized maintenance management
systems (CMMS) the alarm could automatically generate a work
order. Although experienced building operators may know exactly
how to resolve alarms properly and not require detailed guidance, this
method may be especially helpful for organizations with young building
operators, organizations with high turn-over and/or organizations with
the most experienced building operators nearing retirement.
To develop the procedure for resolving alarms information could be
provided from control vendors, lessons learned from building operators
and control technicians through a discussion board. A motivated
BAS contractor might even help, if not lead, the process (this might
help them to develop a proactive alarms module product).
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Ensuring that alarms have been resolved may be a challenge due to the
reactive culture within some facilities. This is especially true
since more nuisance alarms may be the first result from any change in a
facility’s alarm management process.
To help a facility team recognize the importance of this effort
recognize those who have successfully resolved a certain number of
alarms properly. It doesn’t have to be financial - most employees
will tell you that recognition and making a contribution to the
organization are what motivates them more than money.
Consider recognizing employees that contribute most to the success of
the effort as “Alarm Resolution Experts” – it won’t sound silly if it
is backed-up with quantifiable data.
Until recently we thought this was perhaps a lofty idea. However,
we recently had the opportunity to hear how one facility management
team was, among a number of proactive measures, using historic weather
data to project how the building should operate the next day. If
the building did not operate as projected, an alarm was generated and
an automated work order was sent to the building operator to identify
why the projection was incorrect. Although this may not be the
norm, but transforming the industry to using BAS’s to achieve high
performance buildings goals requires out-of-the-box solutions.
Special thanks to our Associate Angela Lewis for this month’s column.
About the Authors
Paul and Ira first worked together on a series of ASHRAE projects including the BACnet committee and Guideline 13 – Specifying DDC Controls. The formation of Building Intelligence Group provided them the ability to work together professionally providing assistance to owners with the planning, design and development of Intelligent Building Systems. Building Intelligence Group provides services for clients worldwide including leading Universities, Corporations, and Developers. More information can be found at www.buildingintelligencegroup.com We also invite you to contact us directly at Paul@buildingintelligencegroup.com or ira@buildingintelligencegroup.com
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]