July 2016 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
BAS Commissioning Basics
The purpose of controls commissioning is to go through the system and validate that it is working the way that it was designed. |
Paul Ehrlich,
Ira
Goldschmidt
& Angela Lewis July Issue -
BAS Column
|
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
A
few months ago, this column covered the basics of developing effective
control system sequences. You might recall that it discussed the
process of how a designer needs to select and describe sequences that
provided safe, reliable and efficient control. Once a sequence is
developed, it then needs to be properly implemented, a challenging task
that falls to the controls contractor, but interpreting the sequence
and programming the system is only one of their many tasks.
First, they need to competitively bid and win the project, then they go
through the process of developing the controls submittals, and
installing the controllers, sensors, and actuators. Finally, they
are at the point where they are ready to interpret the sequence and
create the code that gets used in the controllers. The contractor
may be installing controls on a new construction project where controls
probably are one of the very last items to be completed or they may be
working on a retrofit project where equipment is only shut down for
brief intervals while the new system is installed. In either
case, the contractor is constrained for time (and let’s be realistic,
on budget) to get the program in place, tested, and validated.
The end result, unfortunately, is often a control system that may
“work” but is not operating the way that the system designer had
intended. This is where the important task of controls system
commissioning by either the original controls designer or a third party
commissioning agent comes into play. The purpose of controls
commissioning is to go through the system and validate that it is
working the way that it was designed. It is not intended as a
crutch, or criticism of the contractor, but instead as a quality
control measure intended to verify that the system works as it was
intended in design.
The process for controls system commissioning begins with a review of
the contractor’s test reports. These documents are generally
provided by the contractor and show that they have gone through the
process of checking wiring, connections, and basic system
operation. Ideally, the contractor will also have an updated set
of control drawings available for the commissioning agent as well.
After reviewing reports, the commissioning begins with an inspection of
control panels, end devices, and equipment to verify the proper
component installation. Are the right sensors and actuators
installed in the right places? Is wiring properly
installed? Are control panels installed in a workman like manner
and properly labeled? The commissioning then progresses to the
controls user interface, verifying that the necessary points are
connected and properly reporting at the user interface. System
loops should be observed and trended to see if they are operating in a
stable manner.
The
final step is to start to validate sequences. Much of this can be
done through observation and trending, but in many cases, sequences are
best verified by simulating changes to inputs and watching if the
required outputs change. For example, if the input for outdoor
air temperature is reduced from 75 degrees to 50 degrees, does the
boiler come on? Does the hot water loop temperature setpoint
reset as the temperature is dropped further?
Commissioning is an iterative process. Once we go through the
system, we document our findings into a punch list. The
contractor then fixes any issues, and the system is then
re-tested. Ideally at the end of the day, we have a system that
is properly commissioned and is working the way that the designer had
intended.
A system that works as designed is a win – win - win deal. Good
for the designer, good for the contractor, and great for the owner!
About the Authors
Paul
and IraPaul and Ira first worked together on a series of ASHRAE
projects including the BACnet committee and Guideline 13 – Specifying
DDC Controls. The formation of Building Intelligence Group provided
them the ability to work together professionally providing assistance
to owners with the planning, design and development of Intelligent
Building Systems. Building Intelligence Group provides services for
clients worldwide including leading Universities, Corporations, and
Developers. More information can be found at
www.buildingintelligencegroup.com We also invite you to contact
us directly at Paul@buildingintelligencegroup.com or
ira@buildingintelligencegroup.com
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]