November 2013 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Building to Grid
aka B2G |
Paul Ehrlich, Ira
Goldschmidt
& Angela Lewis November
Issue -
Column
|
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
There has been a lot of talk about the deployment of the “Smart
Grid”. Most of the initial Smart Grid deployments are focused on
the deployment of smart meters that enable utilities to gather usage
information in near real time – or what they call “Automated Meter
Infrastructure” or AMI. The use of AMI provides a number of
benefits including more accurate billing and improved service, easier
provisioning (turning power on or off to a customer), accessibility of
use data by customers, and use of time of day or real time rates.
The Smart Grid also opens up the potential for a series of new
applications including the use of more distributed power and
micro-grids that will result in improved grid resiliency. For
commercial buildings, we should expect that the Smart Grid will provide
a series of solutions that are loosely called “Building to Grid” or
B2G. In short, these are solutions that will better balance
commercial building loads with the capacity of the grid. It is
important to understand what is coming so that you can design to
accommodate systems that are B2G ready.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Today there are several different B2G strategies that you can deploy,
both of which are designed around the management of electrical
demand. The first approach is the use of a traditional Demand
Limiting strategy. This approach provides the ability to reduce
monthly (and often recurring) demand charges by measuring peak demand
and staying below preset levels by extending setpoints or turning off
loads. Demand Limiting is an effective strategy to reduce demand
charges but works independently of the needs of the grid – so it would
not truly be considered to be B2G. The other common approach is
the use of Demand Response (DR) where the building energy demand is
reduced based upon a signal provided by the utility, grid operator or a
third party aggregator. Building demand can be reduced through several
different strategies including extending setpoints, turning off loads,
switching to thermal storage or gas cooling, or utilizing co-generation
or standby generation. Most DR programs provide payments to
owners for participation as well as for each KW (or KWH) reduced.
DR programs are utilized for a limited number of hours, or events per
year and generally owners are only asked to participate during the
hottest days of summer. A DR event can be deployed manually
(based on a phone call, e-mail or fax) or automatically using a signal
that can be directly connected into a BAS. We would strongly
encourage designing a new (or upgraded) system with the use of
automated DR as part of the design. This would include points and
sequences specifically focused on DR. It also requires some
research as to available local programs and how they get
triggered.
While automatic Demand Response is the current “state of the art” in
B2G integration, expect future programs to take this even further
allowing for more dynamic and continued interactions between buildings
and grid operators providing for a more dynamic balance between the
demand for electric power and the varying capacity of the grid.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]