October 2011 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
The Next Generation of Building Energy
Efficiency
Given a building’s energy model and external factors, the software
determines the best plan for the building, targeting the ideal balance
among the three goals of energy cost, consumption, and occupant
comfort. |
|
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Commercial buildings
in the United States represent 20 percent of our
annual energy consumption. With rising energy costs and an increased
focus on energy performance, building owners are looking to save energy
and reduce their utility expenses with less capital and resources. This
translates to building materials and systems that must be far more
energy efficient and cost no more, if not less, than conventional
systems.
With commercial buildings, satisfied occupants set the bar for success.
However, this conflicts with the expectation of solid financial
performance. The challenge facing building owners is to manage these
conflicting goals. A third factor in the mix is the need, either
voluntary or regulatory, to reduce emissions.
Proactively reaching these three competing goals in a complex
commercial building environment becomes almost impossible with today’s
building management system (BMS) tools. Despite high levels of control
at the sub-system level (i.e., water and air temperatures and flows),
there is limited global control and direction across the entire
building. What’s more, there is not awareness within the BMS of other
factors, such as weather forecasts or utility rates, which greatly
affect costs and emissions.
These challenges are tough, especially given the complexity of most
buildings and their energy systems. With the downturn in the industry,
there are fewer managers in buildings. In fact, the best building
managers are being pulled up a level to manage a portfolio of
buildings, leaving less expensive and less skilled managers on the
ground to make the difficult day-to-day decisions.
Redefining Building Energy
Management
In the face of these challenges, new technology is emerging to address
the problems with a promise to redefine the way energy is managed in
buildings. The technology helps owners reduce energy costs without
affecting tenant satisfaction. It also helps building owners and
managers proactively manage energy, while freeing up their time to
focus on other important tasks. Best of all, the technology is
delivered as software, resulting in lower costs and shorter payback
cycles. One example of this new technology is Predictive Energy
OptimizationTM software from BuildingIQ.
In a nutshell, the software understands the internal and external
conditions of a building and guides the energy systems to achieve its
goals. It overlays the BMS and optimizes energy use by continuously
changing BMS set points.
In terms of internal conditions, the software considers many aspects of
the building:
The
software learns the internal operations and creates a complex
energy model that enables accurate forecasting of building energy
requirements under different conditions. It also considers external
conditions:
Given a
building’s energy model and external factors, the software
determines the best plan for the building, targeting the ideal balance
among the three goals of energy cost, consumption, and occupant
comfort. The plan is set a day ahead and is continuously re-optimized
based on any changes to internal and external conditions.
Figure 1 illustrates how Predictive Energy OptimizationTM works on the
HVAC systems in a typical building during a typical day. Note that this
represents data from an existing building in which Predictive Energy
OptimizationTM software has been deployed. The blue line shows the
power levels from the existing settings on the BMS, starting every day
at the same time to ensure the right conditions at occupancy, running
approximately at the same power levels all day to maintain the target
temperature, and shutting off at the end of the day.
Figure 1: The
settings on the BMS start every day at the same time to
ensure the right conditions at occupancy, then run at about the same
power levels all day and shut off at the end of the day.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
In contrast, the red
line shows the power levels that result from
energy optimization software, which has been tailored to the specific
day’s weather and the utility rates. The morning start-up is set to
take advantage of low overnight temperatures and the building’s thermal
mass to store energy while achieving the right conditions at occupancy
with much less power than the standard settings.
Power levels are increased as the day warms, and later in the afternoon
the system ramps up power to cool the building before the peak
electricity-rate period. This same approach is used to automate the
response to DR events, decreasing loads when the electric grid is
strained. After the rate changeover, the earlier cooling allows the
building to “drift” on much lower power levels, with gradual changes to
maintain comfortable conditions throughout the rest of the day.
New Solutions to Old Problems
Predictive Energy OptimizationTM software can be used with a wide range
of BMS types and HVAC infrastructure. It requires no upgrades to a
building or new sensors, and only needs some minor sub-metering and an
Internet connection. Installation and system tuning are heavily
automated, with most of the configuration work done remotely after the
initial installation.
The software can be specified for both new construction and retrofit
projects. It makes sense to install a system such as this at the time
of a BMS upgrade to coordinate any programming work that is needed.
However, that is not a significant consideration. Many of the new
software products bring software business models to the building
industry, charging subscription fees rather than upfront costs. The
subscription fee for Predictive Energy OptimizationTM software is based
on the size of the building, with no capital outlay to install and get
started. As such, the system should pay for itself within the first
month or two of deployment.
Building energy savings of 10 to 30 percent on a continuous basis are
not uncommon. This level of improvement, which could translate into an
increase in Energy Star points, could mean the difference between
getting and not getting an Energy Star label or LEED certification.
Even greater financial benefits may result, given the significant
reduction in peak-tariff energy use. In addition to the financial
benefit, the system dramatically reduces the time required to manage
energy in a building, thereby freeing up the building engineer to focus
on other tasks.
Overall, while the circumstances of installing this kind of software
are not particularly significant, the long-term savings in energy and
labor costs can be huge. Technology of this kind is truly providing the
next generation of energy efficiency in the commercial building space.
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [Home Page] [The
Automator] [About] [Subscribe
] [Contact
Us]
[Click Banner To Learn More]