September 2011 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
How to save money with presence detectors?
Part 1 Techniques |
|
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
When we speak about
energy saving solutions in large buildings
it is clear that the modern BAS (DDC system) will reduce energy
consumption in a building, but very often the building
automation system has no precise procedures for controlling the
lighting system. Using presence detectors, motion detectors and
twilight switches provides many possibilities to increase energy
savings
efforts in a building.
What is the difference between
presence detectors and motion detectors?
There are several misunderstandings in the market about the meanings of
motion detectors (MD) and presence detectors (PD). Both are
based on the passive infrared technology. Some specialists see no
difference and use both terms for many cases.
There is actually a difference. PDs detect the sharp movements of
people and are intended to
be used mainly in offices with enough windows to provide daylighting.
The main purpose of PDs is to support the comfort of the light level
and to save energy by switching off the light or by dimming it
when there is no need for artificial light.
MDs are using mainly for walking areas with less daylighting, or
none at all: corridors, stairs, technical rooms, archives, etc. Their
main
purpose is just to save energy. Both MDs and PDs contain:
How it works?
People emit heat energy which spectrum is located in the infrared and
not visible to the human eye. Sensors detect motion of a warm spot and
transform it to an electrical signal.
Thermal
radiation is detected by an optical lens and projected to the
infrared sensors. Built-in electronics receiving a signal produces a
predefined action (on/off lighting groups, for example).
The system of optical lens captures the
radiation and thermal data on
the infrared sensor. The sensor detection area is divided into active
and
passive zones. That
is why it is very important to locate the sensor in the
right place for it to work properly. With a bigger distance
between the installed
sensors active and passive zones become wider, and harder to
cross zones.
It is important to remember the impact of seasonal effects on the
ambient temperature. In the middle of summer the difference in ambient
temperature and a human body will be insignificant, while in winter
time most of the human body surface is covered by clothes. Also, snow,
rain and fog, absorb infrared radiation and can reduce the range of
detection (for outdoor sensors).
During the installation of PD or MD we have to consider every
interference that might occur:
And
when we are locating PDs in the office area, we need to remember that
sensors can’t see through glass walls.
What is inside?
Both PDs and MDs have 3 common elements on board:
The inside components are equal, however the behaviour of the MD
and PD differs. Inside the PD the light sensor is measuring light levels
all the time. In the MD it measures the light level only during its
first activation; then it only checks motion in the room.
The twilight switch has a different construction than detectors.
Basically it
is a relay module with a light sensor and switched timer.
When the
light level goes down (lower than set up point), the twilight switch
turns on the light, and turns it off in the morning when the light
level again crosses this point in the opposite direction. There are
some models of twilight switches that have additional timers inside and
they use a schedule.
What to choose: PDs or MDs?
In order to make the proper choice we can use the table below:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
In 2009 in Russia we started to follow the German experience of energy savings
solutions with MDs and PDs. Since that time we have researched
more than 300 buildings and determined the economical effects of using local automation lighting technologies
for each building.
Basically lighting takes 10-15% of the total electricity consumption in a
building. The problem is that almost no one is actively involved in saving money
on lighting; people think that the price per kWh is too low, and the economical affects will not be sufficient .
This is a mistake. Take any hotel corridor: lights are on 24*7, 365
days a year; people and hotel staff are there only 20% of the
time. This means that about 80% of the annual lighting expense could be
saved. Besides,
when we know where people are in a large facility, we can reduce HVAC
electrical charges, and these savings will be more interesting
for a
building owner.
In the second part (Projects) of this article I will speak about
solutions (based on MDs and PDs) that we tried in different types of
buildings and what engineers could propose for the facility management
company or building owner.
In the third part (ROI) I would like to share economical
statistics. How to save money with presence detectors. We have done
several experiments with electricity meters which surprised us with the potential of energy savings for a simple solution.
My Facebook http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000810691550
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]