September 2012 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Why Make Smart Buildings Smart Grid Compatible Virtual power plant technology provides the opportunity to aggregate their supply and demand and EMSCO’s and other third parties. |
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Over the last 20 years many billions of dollars have been invested
throughout the world in making commercial and industrial buildings
energy efficient. Much of this has been spent on more efficient HVAC
hardware and further improving efficiency through DDC control systems.
Initially the driver was to reduce operating costs through minimising
energy consumption but making the building environment more comfortable
and more recently legislation to meet new standards have been active
drivers. The Building Energy Management Systems (BEMS) that are now
installed provide the interface with Smart Grid to deliver further
energy cost reductions through Smart Grid load management programs that
can reduce operational costs for both the utility companies and
building owners. The rationale for interfacing demand and supply goes
much further because without it the primary goal for Smart Grid to play
a major role in reducing CO2 emissions in the low carbon economy of the
21st century cannot be achieved. But to make this market move forward
there also has to be a commercial gain and a viable return on the
investment.
The Commercial Drivers
Memoori’s report “The Smart Building to Smart Grid Interface Business”
shows that in most developed countries Industrial and Commercial
Buildings consume 40% of all generated electrical power and the vast
majority of these buildings are already fitted with fully automatic DDC
controls. A significant proportion already generates their own power
and many are investing in more efficient systems including renewable
power. Virtual power plant technology provides the opportunity to
aggregate their supply and demand and EMSCO’s and other third parties
that manage large real estates and are in a strong position to move
this business forward on the demand side.
This fits in pretty well with what major Electrical Utilities want. A
fine tuned system that automatically receives the data from the Smart
Building control systems and balances supply and demand in real time.
Also many Smart Buildings can provide a clean source of distributed
electrical power to meet its CO2 reduction targets whilst reducing the
investment that they would need to make in new generating facilities.
It would be to the utilities advantage if it could achieve this through
aggregating electrical generation and consumption through joining
together a large number of plants. This can be achieved by EMSCO’s
through having contracts at many sites through treating them as virtual
power plants. But what makes the proposition even more attractive is
that the investment needed to achieve this represent only 1% of the
total investment needed to deliver a fully operational Smart Grid and
the return on the investment in the short term looks much more
attractive. Equally as important is the fact that private money will be
available for around 70% of the investment.
There is an almost perfect case for interfacing Smart Buildings with
Smart Grid because all the stakeholders win. However whilst utility
companies are fully behind interfacing to achieve load management
control they are less attracted to buying distributed power from the
commercial and industrial sector.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Their business model is to retain central power generation for as long
as they can and load management control will help them achieve this
through the first phase of decommissioning their coal fired generating
plant. This programme may well be delayed as the introduction of CO2
emission policies are relaxed whilst the present poor economic
conditions persist and this gives them a little more time to hold on.
However in the long term they will be forced to accept power through
distributed generation because utilities will not be able to finance
both the investment in new generating facilities and the Smart Grid at
the same time. Nevertheless this policy of “beggar thy neighbour” in
the mean time will prevent the adoption of best solution. For
distributed energy can be operated in several power exchange modes,
such as import and export, as well as “islanding,” to achieve
operational energy independence from the grid. This flexibility and
redundancy provides a huge increase in capability for how and when
energy is consumed and purchased from, or sold to, the wholesale energy
markets. Smart Building control architecture is essential for achieving
real-time adjustments to the various components of the facility and to
optimize the benefits and savings potential.
There is a massive latent potential waiting out there to be exploited
by the building controls hardware and software manufacturers and as our
report shows there are strategies that can be adopted to take both the
market for load management control and the distributed power interface
systems business.
http://memoori.com/smart-buildings-2012
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]