September 2013 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Application and Control of Air-to-Air
Energy Recovery Units |
Paul Ehrlich, Ira
Goldschmidt
& Angela Lewis September
Issue -
Column
|
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
The application of energy recovery units allows for the ability to do
total heat recovery and recover both sensible and latent heat from an
exhaust air stream and use it to pre-condition outdoor air required for
building ventilation. There are many potential technologies
available for energy recovery including:
The vast majority of applications today are using enthalpy wheels and
that is what we are going to focus on, although the same
concepts can be readily applied to other heat recovery technologies as
well.
In addition to saving energy the use of energy recovery unit (ERU) also
allows for the ability to downsize equipment potentially reducing
project costs. While it makes sense to consider using an ERU for
any project were there is supply and exhaust air, it is particularly
desirable for applications that require a large percentage of outdoor
air. One example of this type of application is a large assembly
area such as a school cafeteria or gym that may require ventilation for
several hundred occupants. For new construction the use of ERU’s
is required under ASHRAE 90.1. The 2007 version of the code,
requires energy recovery for any air handler over 5,000 CFM that has
more then 70% outdoor air with exceptions for dirty environments and
for areas with minimal heating and cooling loads. Under the 2010
version of 90.1 the requirements become more stringent and are driven
by climate zone, air handler size, and percentage of outdoor air.
The codes also now require bypassing the use of the ERU when the air
handler is in economizer, which leads us into an interesting discussion
about proper control of energy recovery.
On the vast majority of existing building projects that we work on we
are finding that the ERU has been designed to operate at all times that
the air handler is in the occupied mode. Operating in this manner
is not always optimal since we end up always recovering energy from the
exhaust air even when we don’t want to. Ideally energy recovery
should only be used when the outdoor air is either hot or cold and we
can use the recovery to pre-heat or pre-cool the incoming air stream.
So here are a series of rules to consider when writing sequences for
new and existing ERU applications:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Ideally the ERU can be equipped with a bypass damper, which allows for
air to be bypassed around the wheel (or the unit) when we don’t want to
be doing energy recovery. On many existing units there is not a
bypass available. In that case we generally will operate the
supply and return fans at all times when the air handler is in
operation but will shut off the rotation of the enthalpy wheel when we
do not want to be doing energy recovery. In order to keep the
wheel from building up with dirt and moisture we “stir” the wheel –
which involves turning it on for a few minutes each hour.
Of course utilizing a variable speed motor for the wheel rotation and
then modulating the wheel velocity based on discharge temperature is
the ideal way to control an ERU. But of course this adds cost and
complexity and other than for systems where you are doing demand
controlled ventilation and dynamically varying the amount of outdoor
air this is probably not a firm requirement.
Used properly energy recovery is an important tool for managing
ventilation and energy efficiency. But just like many other
systems – proper control can make a large difference in the resulting
efficiency and performance of these systems.
About
the Authors
Paul and Ira first worked together on a series of ASHRAE projects including the BACnet committee and Guideline 13 – Specifying DDC Controls. The formation of Building Intelligence Group provided them the ability to work together professionally providing assistance to owners with the planning, design and development of Intelligent Building Systems. Building Intelligence Group provides services for clients worldwide including leading Universities, Corporations, and Developers. More information can be found at www.buildingintelligencegroup.com We also invite you to contact us directly at Paul@buildingintelligencegroup.com or ira@buildingintelligencegroup.com
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]