September 2017 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
|
EMAIL INTERVIEW – Cory Vanderpool and Ken Sinclair
Cory Vanderpool, Director of Business Development, Magnum Energy Solutions
Cory
Vanderpool is the Business Development Director for Magnum Energy
Solutions (www.magnumes.com), located in Hudson Ohio. Magnum is a
manufacturer of wireless energy management technology. Prior to joining
Magnum, Cory was Director of the EnOcean Alliance, an organization
dedicated to the advancement of open, interoperable building
technologies. Cory began her career in government contracting, but
during her pursuit of her PhD in Environmental Policy, she realized her
passion for environmental stewardship was something she wanted to make
her career. Cory serves as a board member for the National Federal
Development Association and was a contributing writer for
TriplePundit.com.
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Sinclair: Please give us an overview of Magnum’s Cardinal introduction.
Vanderpool: Cardinal
IoT is built on Amazon Web Services’ (AWS) open platform. The solution
includes three critical “things,” the first of which starts with the
end devices, which in this case are wireless, self powered sensors that
exist at the “edge.” These sensors collect various data points
associated with the operational systems of the building. These sensors
transport their data over RF to Magnum’s gateway, the cBox or Cloud
Box. The cBox then delivers the information to Amazon’s IoT platform,
where the rules for the logic are established and also where the data
can be further analyzed. The system can be utilized for monitoring
applications but also for controlling devices back to the edge, like
LED lighting, for instance.
Sinclair: What are building managers struggling with as they look to incorporate multiple, disparate devices into the Internet of Things?
Vanderpool: Building
managers will struggle with a variety of questions as they try to
determine what is real and what is hype as it pertains to the IoT. One
issue, although maybe not the most important, will be regarding data
privacy. Who owns the data? We selected AWS because they give customers
ownership and control over their content by design. In addition - and
probably more important - is the issue of data security. If the data
gathered from devices isn’t properly secured, it puts both the end
users and manufacturers like Magnum Energy Solutions (MES) at risk. For
example, the data collected from a smart thermostat can reveal when
someone is home-based from their settings. If this information isn’t
adequately secured, it could be used by thieves to determine when to
break into a home. For MES, partnering with AWS was a critical and
strategic decision based on these two important factors. We didn’t want
to launch a solution that would put MES at significant risk and
therefore chose the industry leader in cloud applications as our
partner.
Sinclair: How can building managers make the best use of the information coming from the Internet of Things?
Vanderpool: There
are many ways in which the IOT will be utilized, from smart buildings
in smart cities to consumer devices, like wearables. As it relates to
the IoT and buildings, MES believes that the real benefit is the
ability to gather data from various sources and analyze it to
understand trends and predict future operational opportunities. For
building owners and managers in the retail space, the IoT allows for
the combination of data from the building, lighting, and point of sales
to drive things like push notifications out to consumers. Corporate
entities that have stores all around the country and aggregate store
data into an enterprise application like Cardinal. Facilities staff and
owners can easily look across their store portfolio to see what is
happening at the various locations and compare this data based on
things like geographical influences, for instance.
Sinclair: What are the implications associated with software-dependent lighting control systems?
Vanderpool: It
isn’t so much that there are limitations, it is that there are
considerations to be paid on whether or not a software dependent
lighting system needs to be utilized for an application. There are many
lighting control systems available today and many of them actually
require a proprietary software platform to bring “intelligence” to the
solution. This software itself can cost upwards of $135 per fixture in
addition to the luminaire costs. These costs reflect the necessary
gateways, commissioning and licensing models.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Because
these systems are proprietary, they are difficult to tie into the IoT
and building automation systems. In most use cases, the data from the
sensor edge would be required to pass through this third-party software
before entering the IoT platform or integrating into the BMS (building
management system), therefore taking an unnecessary and costly step.
Sinclair: How does the push for standards in the IoT impact this effort?
Vanderpool: Internet
of Things alliances, like the new IoT Ready Alliance, are actively
pushing for standards within IoT, but it is important to view these
motivations with careful examination. Solutions from companies like
Enlighted, Daintree, and Lutron are critically dependent on centralized
intelligence since their edge level devices have very limited to no
processing capabilities. When it comes to the advent of IoT, these
centralized systems could have a difficult time finding a home since
the "data" processing they enable is entirely software dependent. This
poses a problem for entry into the IoT since all of these ‘smart’
systems are reliant on proprietary software. They are creating
more disparate stovepipes than seamless integration into the IoT.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]