September 2012 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
|
Increased carbon dioxide concentration impacts human performance
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
A team of researchers from the Environmental Energy Technologies
Division (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) and State University
of New York—Upstate Medical University has found that increasing indoor
carbon dioxide concentrations at the higher end of the range typically
measured in buildings, 1,000 parts per million, and 2,500 ppm, can
reduce human decision-making performance.
Relative to a concentration of 600 ppm in a well-ventilated building,
at 1,000 ppm CO2, moderate and statistically significant decrements
occurred in six of nine scales of decision-making performance. At 2,500
ppm, large and statistically significant reductions occurred in seven
scales of decision-making performance
In previous research, associations of higher indoor carbon dioxide
concentrations with impaired work performance, increased health
symptoms, and poorer perceived air quality have been attributed to
other indoor air pollutants whose concentrations closely correlate with
indoor CO2 with concentrations. Consequently many studies of indoor air
quality use carbon dioxide concentration as a proxy for the
concentrations of an array of other indoor air pollutants.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
This study assessed the direct effects of CO2, within the range of
indoor concentrations, on decision-making, and suggests that carbon
dioxide itself can have impacts on human performance.
The authors write: “the findings of this study, if replicated, would
have implications for the standards that specify minimum ventilation
rates in buildings, and would also indicate the need to adhere more
consistently to the existing standards.”
For more in formation, contact Mark Mendell, MJMendell@lbl.gov.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]