October 2011 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Gas Detection (2 of 2)
Technologies & Applications |
Steven
R. Calabrese |
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Welcome to part two of this short series on gas detection. If you
missed part one, please go back now and read it, as it’s a prerequisite
for this! Joking aside, it helps to understand the basics, as what was
covered last time, in order to appreciate what we cover in this
installment. So now that you’re up to date and have completed your
required reading, on to the next part!
Technologies
Non-Dispersive Infrared (NDIR): Using the principle of infrared
absorption, this sensing technology is based on the premise that
certain gases absorb light at specific bandwidths. The sensor is
“tuned” for the gas to be detected, and the concentration of gas is
measured and converted into an electrical signal. This sensing
technology is suitable for a wide range of refrigerant gases.
NDIR exhibits a high degree of accuracy and has a very fast response
time. With minimal maintenance and a long life cycle, gas detectors
incorporating this sensing technology are suitable candidates for
applications requiring those features, however not to say that you can
“set and forget” these things for years to come! As with all gas
detection systems, proper maintenance and lifecycle replacement are
critical.
Solid State: A somewhat older technology, this semiconductor-based
sensing method gained its popularity in the 1980’s, and is still a
viable option today. The sensing technology entails the absorption of
the gas by the sensor, thereby affecting a change in the electrical
resistance of the solid state component.
These are low cost sensors, are physically robust, and are able to
withstand a high level of humidly. The average life cycle is reported
to be in the range of 5-10 years, of course depending (on what??). They
do need to be checked out and calibrated frequently, so maintenance is
an issue.
Electrochemical: This sensing technology consists of passing the gas
through a pair of electrodes and an electrolyte, thereby generating a
current between the electrodes that’s proportional to the concentration
of the gas. A popular choice, as these sensors can detect most of the
“common” toxic gases.
Electrochemical sensors are low in cost, small in size, and consume
very little power. They have the ability to measure relatively low
concentrations, exhibit a very linear response, and have a high degree
of accuracy. Average life span for these is reported to be 5 years or
less.
Systems
Single-point systems are used in applications that require only a
single gas detector, or in applications that require no more than a
handful of detectors, spread out over a large sensing area and
controlling different ventilation systems. You may find that a
specification calls for a single CO detector to be located in a boiler
room, to turn on an exhaust fan if the concentration rises above the
TWA setpoint (see part one of this series for a refresher on setpoints).
Multi-point systems, on the other hand, are used in applications for
which a single sensor is not adequate. These systems consist of a
central control panel, with inputs for sensors, and relay outputs for
engaging ventilation systems and annunciating alarm conditions. They’re
made to accommodate 2, 4, 8, or more sensors, and depending on your
application, multiple panels may be able to be “cascaded” to provide
even more sensor capacity.
Recently emerging technologies have given way to the “communicating
sensor buss”, which allows for the daisy-chain networking of sensors
via a single twisted pair. Even slicker is the “wireless mesh network”,
whereby wireless (battery powered) sensors communicate their readings
from one to another, all the way back to the central controller.
Sensor Locations & Densities
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Sensor location is extremely important in properly and consistently
detecting the intended gas. Common sense dictates that, to detect gases
lighter than air, you should mount the sensors at a high level, and for
gases heavier than air, mount them at a low level. While this holds
true for most gases, note that CO is heavier than air, although only
slightly so, and only in a completely “still” environment. Any amount
of circulation will disperse the gas, resulting in the concentration of
the gas to be quite consistent within the immediate space. The lesson
here is, for carbon monoxide detecting, put the sensor where your mouth
is (4-5 feet above the floor).
For these gases that are lighter than air, mount the sensors 1 foot
below the ceiling: Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Methane, Hydrogen, Ammonia.
For these gases that are heavier than air, mount them 1 foot above the
floor: Propane, most refrigerants.
With regard to sensor densities, and what that term actually means, for
single-point sensing applications, the term’s not applicable seeing as
you’re only using one sensor. The location of the sensor should be
readily apparent: place the sensor where the “leak” is most likely to
occur. For multi-point sensing, there are rules of thumb and guidelines
out there, however it’s not always that cut ‘n dried.
A popular rule of thumb in laying out a parking garage CO/NO2 detection
system states that you should have a sensor for every 5,000-10,000
square feet of floor space. When figuring in terms of radius, using a
50’ radius per sensor puts us smack dab in the middle of that range. Of
course in using sensors that measure concentrically, there will be
areas of overlap, as well as areas of theoretical “non-coverage”.
Consult the product specifications, and solicit the advice of an
expert, when laying out and physically installing a multi-point gas
detection system.
Practical Applications
Following are some typical applications in which you’re likely to find
a gas detection strategy. Bear in mind that these are only a few of the
more common scenarios, and are presented here to give a “bird’s-eye
view” of the application and implementation of gas detection technology.
• Parking Garages (CO, NO2)
• Boiler Rooms (CO, Methane – for natural gas)
• Chiller Rooms (Refrigerant)
• Battery Rooms (Hydrogen)
• Warehouses (Propane)
• Food processing (ammonia)
Tip of the Month: Have your local expert come in and give you and your
associates a Lunch ‘N Learn on the topic of Gas Detection. A gas
detection system reseller is your best bet, and although he/she may be
partial to the particular product they rep, you’ll still walk away from
the meeting with a more thorough understanding of the general topic
(and a satisfied hunger to boot!).
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]