September 2016 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
|
EMAIL INTERVIEW – Dave Savage and Ken Sinclair
Dave Savage, Senior Director, Field Services Business Development, EcoBuilding Division, Schneider Electric
Dave
Savage is a Senior Director of Field Services Business Development
within the EcoBuilding division of Schneider Electric; he supports the
deployment of advanced service solutions for energy efficient,
comfortable and reliable facilities. Dave has over 38 years of
experience with Schneider-Electric in the building controls industry,
starting with the first generation of computer-based building energy
management. He studied Building Services Design at Newcastle College of
Arts and Technology in the United Kingdom and has experience spanning
systems design, site project management, solution sales, product
development and marketing.
Follow Dave on
LinkedIn: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/dave-savage-6583579
Schneider Electric Blog: http://blog.schneider-electric.com/author/dsavage/
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Sinclair: Given the rapid rate of progress in the buildings industry, why are reactive service models ineffective?
Savage: While
building management systems (BMS) can deliver innumerable benefits to
the facilities staff that maintain them and to the businesses that they
support, they are also inherently complex investments that require
services expertise to maintain. Neglecting regular maintenance
negatively impacts building performance and business operations through
increased system failure and repair costs. 55 per cent of US building owners and operators rely on reactive maintenance,
otherwise known as the ‘run around and put out fires’ approach. This
approach all but guarantees downtime and maximum repair costs.
An effective BMS requires vigilance, since the BMS is only as healthy
as the equipment and sensors that compose it. If these devices fail, so
does your BMS. A perfect example of regular maintenance that is
routinely ignored in reactive service models (and has potential for
significant impact to the BMS) is hiding right in plain sight: HVAC
system control valves and actuators.
Sinclair: How is it that valves and actuators are often overlooked if their failure has the potential for significant impact to the BMS?
Savage: Many
facility managers figure that since their valves aren’t the big
expensive chillers and pumps, they can rely solely on the naked-eye
maintenance method.Most service contracts focus more on electrical
components where it’s easier to see power usage and cost. But the
simplicity of valves and actuators is deceiving: With potentially
thousands of them spread throughout a building, the sheer number alone
make proper maintenance a challenge.
Valves and actuators do an incredible amount of work in a building. The HVAC system, which on average eats 35 per cent of energy use,
thermal energy runs through these devices. Energy use isn’t the only
performance indicator tied to valves and actuators.Valves and actuators
also form the foundation of an effective BMS; they’re the first line of
defense when something goes wrong. In fact, these simple devices are
often the root cause of serious problems such as poor equipment
performance, unproductive maintenance calls, and unexplained rising
energy use.
The bottom line: If HVAC control valves are not operating correctly,
the building could be using much more energy than it should.
Sinclair: What are the most common valve and actuator issues picked up by facility managers?
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Savage: The
six most common problems that occur in both valves and actuators the
building control systems that regulate them can cause energy waste,
unnecessary equipment wear, poor occupant comfort or other costly
headaches.
Sinclair: How can technology and new approaches to service help address these problems?
Savage: As
BMS tools become more robust, many facility managers are using
predictive maintenance to monitor individual valves, actuators, and
other equipment in ways that humans alone simply can’t afford to do.
This up-and-coming service trend has been fueled by energy-efficient
building certification requirements and more stringent energy savings
mandates. Predictive maintenance, sometimes referred to as continuous
or monitoring-based commissioning (MBCx), is a strategy that leverages
cloud-based data collection and analytics to enhance performance around
the clock.
With these predictive analytics tools, BMS proactively alert facility
managers to problems before they bring down the bottom line — or the
HVAC system. These tools can spot leaky valves, control loop hunting,
control signal noise and much more. Once they spot the problem, they
also provide actionable data on how to fix it.
Download my white paper, “Valves and Actuators: Maintaining the Foundation of High Performance Buildings” to learn more.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]