April 2018 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Occupancy Analytics Innovations Offer New Avenues for Discussions on Privacy |
James McHale, Managing Director, Memoori |
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Occupancy analytics in
buildings is fast becoming a big business. The market for occupancy
analytics in commercial office space will grow to $4.6bn by 2022,
according to our latest report – Occupancy Analytics & In-Building Location Based
Services 2017 to 2022. Growth in the occupancy analytics market is
dependant on the sector overcoming the barriers along its course, but
innovative solutions are now emerging to address key issues.
Security
and privacy concerns continue to act as a barrier to occupancy
analytics market growth. Passive tracking of ID cards, smartphones or
other unique identifiers, also provides more information
than is necessary for occupant tracking, sparking privacy concerns.
“We
only use active feedback, so our users don’t have to worry that we’re
following them around,” CrowdComfort Co-Founder & CEO told Memoori
in an interview last month. “Passive occupancy tracking
technologies can enhance the value for the corporation but also make
occupants feel uncomfortable,” he continued.
CrowdComfort
does not track occupants but instead allows them to report issues
through an app. They cannot, therefore, offer data on empty rooms that
would power-down lighting or HVAC systems, for example. It is clear
that passive occupancy monitoring of some kind is necessary to generate
the energy efficiencies promised by the internet of things (IoT). The
ideal technology needs to sense the presence of people in the office at
all times but does so without the intrusivity that “surveillance”
creates.
A
year ago we reported on a US patent filing by BU professor
Thomas Little entitled, “Sensory Lighting System and Method for
Characterizing an Illumination Space.” The system of LED lights and
sensors can detect people, their poses and objects in a room based on
reflected light, then switch lights on or off, change lighting
intensity, and even adjust the LED’s color to suit a situation.
By emitting a brief pulse of light and
timing its reflective response, similar to radar and sonar systems, the
Sensory Lighting System can differentiate between people, pets, and
furniture, and identify actions such as sitting, standing, talking or
even knitting. Once identified, the system can choose the appropriate
lighting response, providing high functionality with the limited
invasion of privacy. The system is also proving it’s useful in
recognizing hand gestures, opening it up to other potential
applications.
While
there is no video involved, the increasing accuracy and ubiquity of
Little’s technology may bring about the privacy concerns it hinted at
addressing. It is still better, in terms of privacy and cost, than
video surveillance but leaves room for improvement.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]More
recently, a new type of sensor devised by technologists
working at Purdue University detects carbon dioxide levels in order to
indicate whether and where people are inside buildings. The low power
sensor system is actually made up of a carbon dioxide sensor that
triggers another sensor, which calculates the number of people in the
room. The system saves energy by keeping the second sensor off until
triggered.
The
carbon dioxide sensor uses microelectromechanical technology, which
involves the use of vibrating plates that are coated with a film. The
film absorbs carbon dioxide, which triggers a change in the vibration
frequency in the presence of the exhaled gas. While the focus of the
technology’s development is low-cost, low-power occupancy tracking, it
holds the added benefit of limited privacy intrusion.
“The
big picture is that being able to turn off the heating and air
conditioning in a sensible way. To do that you need to be able to tell
when a room is occupied and how many people there are,” explains
Professor Jeffrey Rhoads, who led the research on the postage
stamp-sized sensor. “You could think of it as a smoke detector,” added
Rhoads, “except that we are focused on carbon dioxide and not simply
detecting; we are also measuring.”
Carbon dioxide monitoring can also help
maintain air quality, as originally discussed in our 2015 article Smart Building Management System Combats Office
Drowsiness. Typical outdoor carbon dioxide concentrations hover
around 380 parts per million (ppm), but offices, classrooms, and other
buildings were found with concentrations as high as several thousand
ppm. The proliferation of carbon dioxide sensors would offer a range of
benefit for building occupants and track occupancy with fewer privacy
issues.
The
correlation between lower cost sensors and fewer privacy concerns is an
interesting one for the customer and could drive sales of these
technologies when they reach the market. Looking into the long-term
future, however, we should probably expect all these technologies and
more to be working in tandem to provide a highly accurate digital view
of our physical spaces. The status of the privacy
debate at that stage is less certain, but innovations like these
may offer a new avenue for discussion.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]