April 2019 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Cybersecurity or Something Better The buildings industry has almost fully transitioned from pneumatic to DDC software control. But, there is a lingering sense that software should work reliably forever, just like the physics it replaced. |
Therese Sullivan, Customer Marketing Leader, Tridium Inc. Contributing Editor |
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
For
decades now, the vision of intelligent buildings that self-correct when
they are wasting energy and self-adjust when they are providing
anything less than a healthy, comfortable and productivity-enhancing
indoor environment for occupants has been driving the building
automation industry forward. Today, advancements in cloud computing and
machine learning, as well as greater adoption of common standards for
network connectivity and data interoperability, are making the full
vision a reality for some showcase buildings. At the same time,
connected devices are seeping into all types of buildings in less
visionary, more piecemeal ways and sometimes without sufficient IT/OT
oversight. Is this moving us faster toward the intelligent-buildings-for-all
future we expect? Or, is this trend simply creating a larger and more
attractive cyber-threat landscape for attackers, with consequences that
will slow our progress?
IT/OT are converging, as is often said. But, on the issue of how often
the controls software used to operate buildings should be updated there
is a definite difference. Apple, who sets the high bar for mobility IT,
has an approximate rhythm of introducing major version upgrades every
year and incremental upgrades with critical bug fixes every quarter.
For both Apple and Android devices, if a cyber vulnerability is
discovered, the patch is issued right away and applied while your phone
is on the bedstand overnight. Many of the most popular brands in
enterprise software have transitioned from software-as-a-product to
software-as-a-service, in part, to keep ahead of cyber threats. Opting
for SaaS makes it easier for IT administrators to ensure that all
endpoints are up-to-date on software versions and patches that
innoculate against any known viruses and malware.
Recently, government and media cyber-threat watchers have issued
warnings that a significant number of control systems, including those
in commercial buildings, are configured in an insecure manner and
exposed on the Internet. They see vulnerabilities that were addressed
by software upgrades and new versions introduced to the market over a
half-decade ago. In too many cases, best practices haven’t been
followed, and upgraded software just hasn’t been deployed. The
buildings industry has almost fully transitioned from pneumatic to DDC
software control. But, there is a lingering sense that software should
work reliably forever, just like the physics it replaced.
There is a good reason for controls software developers to aim for a
longer upgrade rhythm than is typical of mobile devices and enterprise
SaaS. But, facilities teams that publish guide specifications that ask
all building engineers and controls contractors to be standardized on
control software that is a generation behind the state-of-the-art,
equivalent to half-a-decade or more in time, are risking cyber trouble.
Such examples, on the part of major institutional and commercial
property owners, are out there. Moreover, if the history of
mobile-device IT and SaaS adoption in the enterprise is any
indication, there is a business advantage in continuously equipping
users with tools that incorporate the latest features and functions.
When attempting to quantify the ROI, the ‘stick’ of avoiding a cyber
attack is not as significant as all the ‘carrots’ related to higher
productivity and better business outcomes.
Over the last 20 years, Tridium has made major investments in
continuously improving the cyber-defenses native to Niagara Framework
and all of our software products. We’ve kept pace with the latest
approaches to user authentication, encryption and incident response,
working in partnership with government cyber-defence teams like
ICS-CERT. Because cybersecurity is as much about people and processes
as technology, we’ve also provided guidance to Niagara systems
integrators, business partners, and facility managers to deploy control
systems with a cybersecurity mindset. Now you can power control devices
at the supervisory level, the field device level and at the network
edge with Niagara Framework, which means Niagara customers have a
unified means of managing cyber-defense at all levels. This makes it
easier to enforce cyber-security best practices. (Read Tridium’s Cybersecurity White Paper to learn more about these.)
Of
course, such a multi-tiered cyber-defense approach works best when all
Niagara instances are assured of the latest security features,
enhancements, and updates through a Software Maintenance Agreement
(SMA). To draw upon the stick-and-carrot metaphor above, the answer to
the question “What do you get with an SMA?” might start with
“Cybersecurity.” But, the fact that an SMA also assures access to our
latest technology for graphics visualization, provisioning, tagging and
analytics, certifications and compliance, and more – it is the carrots
that will have the greatest impact when quantifying Return on
Investment.
The
data-driven Intelligent Building is within our reach today but has a
lot of software dependencies. Addressing the issue of cybersecurity by
embracing the use of standard IT software practices like SMAs is
going to get us there faster.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]