January 2013 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
The Evolution of Electronic Controls – Part Two
And then came DDC |
Steven
R. Calabrese |
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
The Evolution of Electronic Controls – Part One From prehistory to the present-day
The birth of the computer paved the way for processor-based control as
we know it today. However, DDC wasn’t created overnight. It has evolved
over time, just as with any technology, to where it’s at now. The
present-day meaning of the term DDC has become synonymous with
computer-based control or even more specifically, microprocessor-based
control. However, the basic definition of the term has more esoteric
connotations.
Defining DDC
The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) defines DDC as follows:
Direct Digital Control – Closed loop control of a condition applied
directly at application using a digital loop with feedback to sense
changes in condition.
If we try to dissect this definition, we find that it basically
describes a typical controller. Closed loop control means that a
controller is controlling a process and at the same time sensing the
process (feedback) in order to determine subsequent actions to be taken
on the process. The definition distinguishes “digital control” from
other types of control by simply stating that the control process is
done using a “digital loop”. The definition doesn’t really offer any
true insight into what is meant by that.
The term digital is an extension of the word “digit”. In modern
electronics, digital refers to the notion that a piece of electronic
information, or bit, can assume a digital value of either a zero
(absence of voltage) or a one (presence of voltage). By stringing a
series of bits together, a real world value can be represented,
electronically. This digital representation of a real world value can
be understood and processed by a computer, which only understands
information in this digital format. A simple example that relates
digital electronics to HVAC controls is temperature. A temperature
reading can be taken from a sensor, yet the temperature value must be
converted from its continuous, real world format, to something a
microprocessor can understand. A microprocessor-based controller can
accept this temperature as a real world, or “analog” input, convert it
to digital information (zeros and ones), process it, and perform an
appropriate control action on some end device in response to the sensed
temperature. Yet in the case of the proportional end device, such as
the radiator control valve that we discussed in Part One of this
series, the control action must be in the form of a real world value,
and not in a digital format. The controller will calculate the
appropriate action to be taken on the end device, digitally, and then
convert the digital result into an analog control signal, one that can
be accepted by the electronic actuator of the control valve.
We begin to gain a little bit of an understanding of what is meant by
digital control. First and foremost, we can say that digital control is
microprocessor-based. A computer is at the center of the process. This
computer is supported by converters that allow the computer to interact
with ”the real world”: input signals that represent real world values,
and end devices that can accept real world control signals. The
computations are performed digitally, by the computer. This is the
fundamental concept of DDC.
The term DDC has been broadened to mean many things to many people, yet
the above explanation is the “technically correct” version. In today’s
market, other terms are often used interchangeably with the term DDC.
Terms such as Building Automation System (BAS) and Facility Management
System (FMS) typically refer to fully networked control systems,
systems that utilize digital controllers to perform the control of HVAC
equipment, all networked together and to some “front end” computer
workstation. While there is no dispute that these fully networked
control systems are DDC systems, sometimes the term DDC is
(incorrectly?) used to express networking. A single digital controller
operating a piece of air handling equipment can be thought of as a DDC
system. A building full of “stand-alone” digital controllers (sans the
network cable) can also be referred to as a DDC system. Run the network
amongst all of the controllers, and you have yourself a networked DDC
system, or a BAS. The point is, the term DDC should not automatically
imply that the system is networked. This common “misinterpretation”
shows, in one way, how the basic term has been stretched and extended
to cover more than perhaps what it originally was coined to signify.
Centralized DDC
“Back in the old days…” The first versions of digital control systems
were what are referred to now as centralized systems. These systems
consisted of a main central processing unit (CPU), typically located in
the maintenance engineer’s office, or somewhere else suited to its
mammoth presence. All inputs and outputs were located at this central
location. Inputs and outputs took the form of printed circuit cards
that occupied space within the enclosure that housed the CPU. The more
inputs and outputs that were needed, the more cards would reside in the
“card cage”.
All HVAC equipment control points (sensors, switches, end devices,
etc.) were wired back to the central control location, terminated as
required at the appropriate input/output cards. These cards were
electronically interfaced with the CPU, of which was custom programmed
to perform all of the appropriate control functions of all connected
HVAC equipment. You could imagine how easily a system such as this
could become a virtual “rat’s nest” of wires. Suffice it to say that
neat and orderly installation practices were of the utmost importance
for these systems. Of course only to be negated when it was time to
revise existing controls or add new equipment.
In the present century, there are likely very few (if any) of these
dinosaurs still out there and in operation. There would possibly be
some still in existence, were it not for the whole Y2K thing at the
turn of the century. The concern was that the turnover of the calendar
from the 1900s to the year 2000 would have adverse effects on many
computer-based systems that weren’t originally designed to take this
into consideration. Along with this concern came an immense onrush of
upgrades, software rewrites, and system replacements. Thus, it is
likely that many of these centralized digital control systems, having
surely outlived their useful lives at this point anyway, were torn out
and replaced with Y2K-conforming “distributed control systems”.
Distributed DDC
The centralized digital control systems gave way to what we call
distributed digital control systems. With distributed DDC, the
computing power is de-centralized, and not concentrated in one location
via a single CPU. The logic is spread or distributed among digital
controllers, each equipped with microprocessors, which are selected
and configured to perform the control of a specific piece of equipment
or subsystem. Distributed DDC is the present “state of the art”.
To put forth an example of a distributed DDC system in a typical HVAC
application, consider a four-story facility served by a central station
VAV air handling unit. The air handler is located in a mechanical room,
and consists (minimally) of a supply fan, return fan, economizer
section (outside, return, and exhaust air dampers), hot water coil, and
refrigeration (DX) coil, piped to an outdoor air-cooled condensing
unit. The air handler serves terminal units on all floors: cooling-only
VAV boxes for the interior zones, and VAV boxes with hot water reheat
coils for the perimeter zones. A hot water system, consisting of two
hot water boilers, two system pumps, and distribution piping, serves
the air handler’s hot water coil, as well as the perimeter VAV box
reheat coils. The boilers and pumps are located in the basement of the
facility.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
In the old days, to control all of this equipment digitally basically
meant wiring out from a central control panel to all of the various
equipment in the facility. Yet now with distributed digital control at
our disposal, we would be inclined to implement such control. For
instance, the central station air handler would be equipped with a
local digital controller, that would accommodate all required points of
control for that piece of equipment. This includes (but is not limited
to), start/stop control of the supply and return fans, proportional
control of the economizer damper actuators, proportional control of the
hot water valve, and staged control of the (remote) air-cooled
condensing unit. For the terminal units, each unit would be equipped
with a digital controller capable of operating the primary air damper
as a means to maintain zone temperature setpoint, and for those with
hot water coils, capable of modulating the hot water control valve as
well. For the boiler plant, A digital controller would be located in
the basement, in proximity to the boilers and pumps, and be capable of
performing all facets of boiler plant control, including the staging of
the boilers, pump start/stop control, and the like.
For each piece of equipment or subsystem operated by a digital
controller, the logic for that particular equipment/subsystem is
resident within that particular controller, and provided that each
controller is programmed or configured correctly, the controllers will
operate their respective equipment and subsystems in stand-alone
fashion, with no dependency upon anything else for the operation of
said equipment. The logic for the overall HVAC system (air handler,
terminal units, and boiler plant) is distributed among decentralized
controllers, each performing their own tasks. This in essence is a DDC
system. A bunch of stand-alone digital controllers operating various
HVAC equipment within a facility, all properly configured so as to be
able to work together and provide the functionality of a single HVAC
system. Now, tie all the controllers together with a network cable, and
you have a networked distributed DDC system, or a Building Automation
System (BAS). The controllers can be set up to share information over
the network, so as to coordinate tasks, operate via a single
time-of-day schedule, etc. Add a personal computer to the network, as a
“front end”, and you complete the BAS, by gaining access to all of the
various operating parameters and monitoring functions.
Tip of the Month: Words of Wisdom – Although technically around for
decades, DDC as we know it today is a relative child in this industry,
as compared to its mechanical counterparts. This century will bring
about massive changes in our industry, and we must keep up with the
technology, or be left behind to design control systems using the old
school methods of yesteryear.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]