January 2016 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
|
EMAIL INTERVIEW
Anno Scholten and Therese Sullivan
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Anno Scholten, President of Connexx Energy, has had a very busy year
extending his company’s 'last mile' energy solutions for Smart Grid and
Smart Buildings. But, I caught up with him during the waning days of
2015 and asked him the existential questions on the minds of many in
the industry:
Therese: Why have system integrators (SI’s) had such a hard time
converting their building owner customers over to data analytics and
web services for energy and comfort performance management?
Anno: It does feel like too few are deciding to buy. You
pitch the technology. Customers seem to like it. You go away to write
the proposal. But, questions of ‘Who’s going to run it?,’ skepticism
about ‘Will it really work?,’ fears of ‘When will it payback?’ haunt
them overnight. Or it seems that way because the next morning they wake
up and say ‘You know, our energy bills are not that high.’ Maybe
owners haven’t yet been pitched the right solution for them, for their
particular building, staff, functional constraints, and mix of
equipment?
Therese: When is that pattern going to change?
Anno: The energy services market is a vibrant place. I can list at
least six new go-to-market strategies for Smart Building technology
based on the many types of companies seeking to partner with and
license software from Connexx Energy. For SI’s that means there are a
lot of other people knocking on the customer’s door. But, that is not
entirely bad. It also means you’re not alone in trying to educate and
battle against the greatest competitor: Mr. Do Nothing. Once he’s
defeated, it’s ‘Game On.’
Therese: What are these six alternative routes to market?
Anno: Some of these routes are driven by customer demand,
some by governments —particularly new city-level energy performance
disclosure legislation—and many by desire for ‘stickiness’—that is, to
have an offering that forges a stronger, longer-lasting relationship
with more satisfied building owner customers. Who doesn’t want that?
#1 Utilities: The
‘stickiness’ factor is huge with utilities. The
near-monopolistic hold on customers that some utilities have enjoyed in
their regions is being challenged. The innovators have recognized that
they have a built-in channel to the CFO’s office in the form of the
energy bill, and what they do with that channel today will determine
whether they stick around tomorrow when the customer has more options.
I know that Constellation Energy pioneered automated demand response
technology so its large building customers would have a means to reduce
their energy bills through Automated Load Control (ALC) strategies.
Customers use the online application to check real-time pricing and
power usage information and to identify demand reduction strategies at
critical times. If a utility is not offering a similar program today,
they are falling behind the times. The pressure for utilities to
leverage
Smart Building technology to offer innovate services is only going to
increase. For example, energy retailer Direct Energy acquired the
Panoramic Power in November to incorporate all the capabilities of the
start-up’s wireless current tracker in its basket of services.
Panoramic is a Connexx Energy partner and their small sensor-packed devices
track energy consumption at the individual circuit breaker level.
Another interesting utility acquisition move is Duke Energy's
recent purchase of Phoenix Energy Technologies.
#2 MEP Firms: Mechanical/Electrical design firms have a
stickiness challenge as well, and they also see Smart Building
technology as a way to extend their stay in customer budgets, minds
and hearts. Traditionally, owners see them as their trusted advisors
throughout the design/construction phases. But, then once the keys are
handed over and normal operations commence, that tie is severed. The
engineers are thus cut off from any feedback about how their design
decisions are working out. With high energy performance buildings, MEP
firms shouldn’t drop their customer’s hands. But they have had blinders
on when it comes to control system capabilities—blinders provided by
the big equipment manufacturers. They understand that they need to spec
open protocols like LON and BACnet; but, most haven’t caught on to the
fact that equipment vendors can claim a BMS is BACnet-compatible, but
still lock the building owner into their channel through proprietary
implementations and applications. MEP firms are just waking up to the fact that BMS
internal systems are not designed for collecting 3, 5, 10 years of data
— and that they actually want to do that. When we show them that they
can do data acquisition at this scale and that they can get good
quality information out of an energy management information system
(EMIS), the blinders come off. One big MEP firm Connexx has just
started to work with has already launched its building optimization
practice. They said “We’ve known we have to do this. We have the
customers. We have the sales materials. The only thing we haven’t had
is this technology.”
#3 Construction Firms: Similar to the MEP firms, construction
companies building sophisticated new energy efficient buildings are
finding Connexx Energy in the drive toward more satisfied customers and
a stickier relationship. One such company representative commented “Every building
owner thinks every construction manager sucks at their job. That’s not
acceptable. The truth is we haven’t had the capabilities needed to
manage buildings during the warranty phase. How can you be responsible
for what happens inside the building over those first critical months
of operation when you don’t have any data telling you that something is
going wrong, nor the tools and data that would enable you to manage the
building enough to fix things. It makes the Construction Manager look
incompetent. But, we’re really just being set an impossible task. The
Smart Building approach changes this dynamic. I want to have the
data and analytics. I want to resolve all the issues before the building owner calls
me.”
#4 ESCOs: Energy services companies (ESCOs) and the performance
contracting model have been around a long time. ESCO-type 7 to 20 year
agreements are based on an ability to guarantee energy savings from
conservation measures like demand response and lighting upgrades.
What have been missing are the tools, data and analytics to really know the impact of
those measures. The need to know and to disclose energy performance
results publicly is growing. Energy companies like Berkshire Hathaway
Energy are signers and supporters of the American Business Climate Pledge, so
they’re committed to more renewable energy generation and to reducing
emissions from their plants. Connexx Smart Building services have
enabled ESCOs to be more successful. The road to this success has not
been without some hassles and channel conflicts. For instance, one
partner has a contract with a building owner in New York, and it
brought in Connexx for some data integration projects. To access the
BMS data we needed to call in various SI affiliates contracted to the
BMS manufacturers. And every time, their first reaction is “Who
are these guys?“ What we were asking for would take no more than
two days of work. But, the first quote to release the data was $60K.
That’s unacceptable. The customer had sufficient clout with the BMS
manufacturer to eventually get to a realistic bid. That SI lost trust
with the building owner. These situations are going to cause further
deterioration in that old channel model.
#5 Building Owner End Users - Another category of customer for
Connexx Energy exemplifies another go-to-market strategy for our Smart
Building tech. We’ve just signed a large REIT in a big city. It has just
hired its own data scientist to work with us. His job is to
develop and run all the algorithms, queries and applications the REIT’s
top management and facilities team is interested in. They want the
talent to query and interpret data to be in-house. Another example is
the NREL. We’re helping them set up all the buildings on one campus for
analytics, 50k+ points. They have the data scientists to do something
interesting. You’ll find similar data science capabilities inside
companies that compete in process control industries. Whether they
process food, pharmaceuticals or chemicals these companies already know
the power of data to ensure quality and to prove compliance.
#6 OEMs: Connexx is now working with a manufacturer of heat pumps and
packaged units on a data analytics feedback loop for their products in
the field. Like the MEP consultant and the construction company
examples, some OEMs have realized that Smart Building technology gives
them a better way to deliver customer satisfaction. When we tell them
we can pull data from some customer’s basement and deliver it directly
into the hands of their own technicians, they’re excited. They’re quick
to work through the rest of the solution - the customer communications,
incentives and logistics to make that happen. They know this is a game
changer that is going to make for better product design and eventually
prove to be a competitive advantage.
Therese: You have me thinking. How about this for a 7th route to market: O&M outsource companies?
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Anno: The O&M outsource market is also keenly interested in this
technology. CBRE recently acquired ESI and JLL uses
Intellicommand technologies to provide better Operations and
Maintenance services for their customers.
Therese: How do traditional system integrators fit into this new scene?
Anno: First, they need to take stock of the new situation. They are not
going to be the only vendor in the building offering building data
services. They may have the attention of the facility manager, but some
of these other players are knocking at C-level doors. SI’s affiliated
with a certain BMS manufacturer cannot treat customers like they are
captured. They cannot keep up the pretense that programming a sequence
of operations for equipment that they installed is a dark art. They
cannot charge whatever they want to do this work. What they can do is
step up their game. There is nothing stopping SIs from leveraging the
same enabling technology that Connexx brings to these other
go-to-market partners. They are well-positioned to also provide
more significant services to the end customer. Remember analytics just
shows you what needs to be done; the information doesn’t fix the
problem. So there is more opportunity for the traditional SI to partner
with data scientists employed in some of the other provider categories
to follow-through with corrective actions.
I like to think that Connexx is changing the market for everyone.
As news of energy saving and value enhancing results from Smart
Building technology gets out through all these pathways, you’re going
to be able to have much more meaningful conversations with building
owners about your own offering.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]