June 2018 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Creating Empathic People-Centric
Buildings |
|
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
My
last column entitled Humanistic Digital Inclusion has taken us all on
the new road to people-centric buildings.
When you start down a new road you see everything differently, meet new
people, (like the people in our buildings), are exposed to new ideas
which come with new ways of
thinking. Humanistic Digital Inclusion is that new road that
winds through
our old building-centric thoughts while taking us to the new world of
people-centric buildings and how we might achieve the necessary
intellect and emotional intelligence in our implementations. We need to
empathically understand and share the feelings of the people of our
buildings with our evolving digitizations.
My last month's tongue-in-cheek comment, "Our rapid digital
transformation of everything has exposed (made transparent) the
location, presence, even the mood, and feeling of the occupants (those
pesky people!) who are our reason for building and automating in the
first place", has re-routed us all to this new road of thought of how
we
might create empathic people-centric buildings. Please join me on
the following global road trip.
This article from Sweden helps provide an endorsement of digital
inclusion and direction for action; We are Not in the Business of Smart Building
Technology, We are in the Business of Occupant Wellness
Published: May 3rd, 2018 by Memoori provides resource and connection to
further discussions.
Sinclair,
Dooley, and Memoori will all be speaking at the Nordic Smart
Building Conference Helsinki, on June 6th and 7th this year. An
event whose program title reads “intelligent technology is for humans,
not real estate.”
Intelligent
technology is for humans, not real estate. It’s easy to get lost in the
digitalisation buzz and forget about the end value. At Nordic Smart
Building Convention industry leaders & pioneers give you the human
centered & efficient steps to smart digitalisation.
It is very unfortunate that the Recomm
IBcon event, THE AGE OF ACCELERATION Navigating Global CRE
Technology and Innovation is occurring the same date in the USA as the
Nordic event. Be sure to watch
this video
on how we got to the age of acceleration. If you are unable to join us
in Helsinki be sure to take in this event in Las Vegas. This is one of
their sessions High-Performance DIGITAL AMENITIES – Tenant/Guest
Engagement and Experience Platforms. We are a media sponsor of this
event, and I normally attend but this year am engaged in learning more
about what inclusion and empathic might mean to people-centric
buildings.
This re-imagined engineering Australian marketing piece challenges us while
depicting and explaining simply the concepts of the new people-centric
road.
Intellectually
and emotionally intelligent buildings
In a
survey by Management Today magazine, 97 percent of respondents said
they regarded their place of work as a symbol of whether or not they
were valued by their employer. Yet alarmingly, only 37 percent thought
their offices had been designed ‘with people in mind.’
It’s easy for
some engineers to get so caught up in technology and digital tools that
they forget the humans using them. A historical approach has brought
about a misalignment between how traditional engineers view
‘intelligent’ buildings and how owners and occupiers view ‘intelligent’
buildings.
Buildings were
never meant to operate in isolation from users; rather in
‘synchronisation’ with them.
For a building
to be smart and connected, it doesn’t have to be complicated. It’s up
to the building designers to consider all the complexities involved in
designing a human-centred and emotionally intelligent building – and
then to design ‘simple’ ones. This means having empathy for the needs,
challenges, daily tasks, desires, and long-term goals of the people who
use them.
Creating
buildings that are both intellectually and emotionally intelligent will
be the currency in the future as companies start to realise that their
bottom line depends largely on the wellness, happiness, and
productivity
of their people.
Their website is extremely
thought-provoking and well worth a visit.
But to achieve Intellectually and Emotionally Intelligent
Buildings we need to understand those people better and what we
are doing to them.
In case you missed this article - Maximizing Human
Comfort – Why Do HVAC Systems Suck So Much? - Brad
White, P.Eng, MASc Principal, SES Consulting Inc. Canada
Most occupants
in commercial buildings are dissatisfied with their space temperature
and indoor air quality. That statement may not surprise most of us in
the HVAC industry, but when you stop to think, it is a rather shocking
denunciation of our craft. This dissatisfaction applies equally to both
green and conventional buildings. Providing ventilation and space
temperature control are the entire reason that HVAC systems exist, but
the overwhelming majority of end users aren’t happy with the systems
that we’re designing and building.
This follow up article, Thermal Delight - The
Coming Revolution in Personalized Comfort - Brad White, P.Eng,
MASc Principal, SES Consulting Inc. Canada
We engineers
sometimes get so caught up in HOW to do something we lose sight of WHY
we’re trying to do it in the first place. So it was refreshing to
listen to the recent episode of the 99% Invisible podcast, Thermal
Delight, for some new perspectives on comfort in buildings; ideas
primarily gleaned from leaders in the fields of architecture and
design. I’d encourage everyone to listen to it for themselves as it
raises some thought-provoking ideas around comfort in buildings. If
you’re pressed for time, skip ahead to about 18:00.
When
HVAC and building controls engineers talk about comfort, the discussion
primarily revolves around setpoints. The default response to any issue
or complaint regarding comfort is “Are we meeting setpoint?”, followed
closely by “Do we need to change the setpoint?”. Research would suggest
that this approach reveals a poor grasp of the factors that actually go
into determining whether or not someone is comfortable in a space. It
assumes a very static view of comfort when, in reality, comfort is
relative and impacted by a number of factors that are continuously
varying. Knowing that it is very easy to see why HVAC systems that
depend on static setpoints with limited input from occupants have an
extremely low rate of satisfaction. We like different things at
different times, and our preferences are shaped by our mood, age,
cultural norms, clothing choices, outside conditions, to name a but few
of the variables. There are no handy calculations that tell you how to
factor these things in, so it’s no wonder that the engineers who design
HVAC systems have long focused almost exclusively on variables they can
reliably control.
This article echoes the problem The Value of
Occupant Comfort: An old problem, never solved - Matt Ernst,
PE, CEM, QCxP, LEED AP Burns & McDonnell USA
I think Tom’s
hits on another great point as well. The engineering community doesn’t
care about the occupants of the building. They really don’t. Their job
is to design a system that meets ASHRAE standards. The reality is that
the burden of keeping people comfortable within a building has always
been the sole responsibility of the building manager and head building
technician. This team does not have the time, training, or tools to
properly start and run and occupant engagement campaign. Until occupant
satisfaction, and its direct manifestation in bottom line dollars can
be transparently shown to both tenant and building management, no one
will ever put in the time and effort to quantify occupant
comfort/satisfaction on a regular basis.
The flaw of
the past 20 years and the reason why the building comfort industry has
shown little improvement has nothing to do with the quality of
engineering or innovative product development. The problem is a
management problem. How can we quantify occupant satisfaction and then
actively manage it? The adage “you can’t manage what you can’t measure”
continues to ring true today.
The Smart
Building Industry needs to quantify occupant satisfaction and put it in
dollars (directly calculated by improved occupant-employee
productivity). The industry has never has been able to do this on a
building by building, tenant by tenant, or person by person level.
This USA article speaks to Building Wellness -
Today, building owners, operators, occupants, and tenants are all
looking for work environments that embrace technology to enable
collaborative, healthy and comfortable working experiences. - Marc
Petock, Chief Communications Officer, Vice President, Marketing,
Lynxspring & Connexx Energy
There’s no
question that building wellness can generate value such as savings in
personnel costs, reduced sick days, increased productivity, increased
building asset value and greater marketability.
While we are
beginning to see more information on well-being points and how they are
impacting the built environment, we still have some way to go. We are
still defining how to achieve building wellness and provide more proof
of ROI, data, and metrics to occupants and building owners alike. While
more business cases are required to be made, the building wellness
movement is gaining momentum.
This is a great Canadian resource
www.healthyheating.com was
established by Robert Bean in 2004 as a volunteer based not for profit
educational resource serving as a technical interpreter and
consolidator of academic research done between the building and health
sciences.
Watching us sweat is extremely graphical
"As evidence
of the importance of radiant heat exchange to the body’s thermal
equilibrium, physiologists have discovered that living human skin has
extraordinarily high absorptivity and emissivity (0.97), greater than
almost any other known substance, matte-black metals included.
Consequently, we are highly responsive to changes in mean radiant
temperature."
Dr. A. Marsh
We have
roughly 166,000 thermal receptors in our skin with most of them
sensitive to heat loss.
This graphic shows that developing intellect will
be hard
I love this graph Maps of bodily sensations associated with different
emotions.
Hot colors show activated, cool colors deactivated regions. Credit:
Lauri Nummenmaa, Enrico Glerean, Riitta Hari, and Jari Hietanen.
Citation/Overview
Empathic Building as a service - Finland
Tieto Empathic Building
is a human-centric digital service that focuses on improving employee
well-being, happiness and increasing individual performance by solving
end-user problems. By automating time-consuming and non-productive
tasks of communication and administration,
it
enables and encourages your employees to
straight-forward human interaction, collaboration, and co-innovation.
Tieto Empathic Building includes all the necessary tools for developing
human-centric workspace design: It gives an instant view on, not only
the physical space and supporting technology within, but also work
content and issues affecting work culture.
It helps in
bridging the gap between building utilization and employee
satisfaction – with the selected KPI’s and data to prove it. This, in
turn, accelerates the transformation from traditional office-based
activity towards intuitive, agile and efficient activity-based working.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
My conclusion is people are complex and how they interact with comfort
is even more complex so achieving Empathic People-Centric Buildings
will
be hard, but that is what the road ahead shows. We can all
start by simply having empathy for the people we are serving. This is
not my first column about Human-Centric Building Automation
last Oct 11, 2017, I wrote, Thanks for joining me on my
thinking-out-loud journey to better understand new approaches evolving
in our industry in the area of human-centric building automation. Also
wrote this People-Powered Transformation
All of us are engaging in a transformation for the greater good.
People-Powered Transformation will occur when and as fast as we allow
it, but only when all the people it touches embrace that coming change.
Ken Sinclair | Sep 27, 2017, I am sure it will not be my last about the
subject.
Below, I quote more from the re-imagined engineering Australians'.
interesting the globalization on this new road
People at the centre
It’s about
people, not buildings or technology
Buildings of
the Future will know how many of the workforce are in the building at
any one time and adjust services accordingly. Advancements in
monitoring and security, building management system apps, information
screens, WiFi, automated elevators, lighting and air conditioning will
mean that services are adjusted before the worker even steps out of the
Building of the Future elevator. Buildings will ‘self-tune’ on a
continual basis.
Yet with the
digital age upon us, it’s important to remember that technology is not
only about hardware or software, but about people. Among the bits and
bytes, let’s not forget the flesh and bones.
We invite you
to join us on this journey of discovery as we build (pun intended) our
knowledge, understanding, and readiness.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]