November 2009 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
There are two
fundamentally different approaches to Energy Interoperation: managed energy
and collaborative energy. |
Toby Considine |
Under managed energy, the energy provider directly manages the devices and systems in the end nodes using direct control signals. Utilities designed early smart grid deployments to communicate with the smallest, cheapest systems, ones that can fit easily into appliances and home thermostats. Social equity concerns, i.e., mandates that low income consumers have access to the benefits of smart energy, dictated that these devices could not materially affect the price appliances. Consumers want reliable systems; it is hard to convince them to pay more for systems that can be turned off by someone else.
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Utilities often refer to this approach as the
Residential option. Occasionally they refer to it as the ZigBee approach,
because that trade association is the primary technology used to install these
low end systems. Others may call it the OpenHAN (Home Area Network) approach,
although the information and interactions are indistinguishable from those of
ZigBee.
Managed energy is also used for some small commercial buildings.
Collaborative energy relies on clear price signals and market interactions to
engage the occupants of the end nodes in active participation in energy. Today,
early forms of collaborative energy are in operation, the result of custom
engineering and proprietary signals. In a few places, these buildings receive
signals form OpenADR (automated demand response). OpenADR is a hybrid signal,
halfway between managed and collaborative energy.
A key agreement along the national smart grid standards roadmap was that
collaborative and managed energy would be full peers, developed side by side.
Where appropriate both would use semantics from the Power Management Common
Information Model (CIM) developed by IEC TC57. Collaborative energy, though,
will not adopt the deep integration that characterizes CIM-based integration.
The key standards committees of collaborative energy are making loose, light,
and market-centric interfaces. EMIX (Energy Market Information Exchange)
communicates price and product descriptions—and prices and products vary over
time. Energy Interoperation, the successor to OpenADR, defines the interactions
between the grid and end nodes, and includes distributed energy resources (DER)
(site-based storage and generation) as well as demand response. WS-Calendar will
define the time and interval aspects of the above standards. We plan to
incorporate WS-Calendar into oBIX as well.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
The one part that remains is access to live energy usage information. The
utilities continue to guard this information closely, pretending that it “might
not be accurate”. Meter quality control was critical when a meter reader might
write down numbers incorrectly, or be chased from a yard by a dog. With today’s
digital readings, it is a transparent sham. With OpenADE, the utilities are
reluctantly sharing day later data with Google and Microsoft, but not the
building occupants in real time.
A new group, the Energy Information Standards Association (EISA) is trying to
address this last critical element. Their vision includes not only a standard
format for live energy usage from the meter, but from each intelligent appliance
and system in the building as well. The first thing this does it let
building-based systems not only understand the total energy load of the
building, but to be able to distinguish between the smart or collaborative load
and the dumb or unmanaged load. The second and more exciting part is it enables
autonomous load shaping.
Autonomous load shaping gets buildings ready for site-based energy storage and
generation. Today, energy spikes, say when the motors in two systems start at
the same time, are handled by the abundant energy of the grid. A building
running on a battery or on site-based solar does not have that luxury. It has a
fixed energy budget that it must live inside. Autonomous load shaping not only
creates a more valuable asset to the smart grid. It increases the value of a
building’s internal energy resources.
Regular readers will recognize collaborative energy as a market opportunity for
automated buildings suppliers and integrators. Autonomous load shaping will
expand the market for intelligent systems in buildings. Watch the market
standards of the smart grid closely as they develop.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]