April 2020 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
What
does Yoga have to do with building systems? Unlike Yoga masters, buildings systems are inflexible, yet building conditions are highly dynamic. |
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
There
has been a wave of discussions about the recent article titled Wireless Ways on contractormag.com in LinkedIn
forums. Questions are rapidly emerging about how and why new
technologies are going to solve age-old problems in buildings. The
question is, what problems are these technologies trying to solve, and
why are they problems in the first place?
While there may be many problems, there is
a common perception that building automation systems do not work as
intended. Buildings are uncomfortable, and they are expensive to
maintain and operate grossly inefficiently. This is an important
problem given that we spend a large amount, if not the majority of our
lives in these very environments, which also contribute to over 40% of global energy consumption according to the U.S.
Department of Energy.
These problems stem from a rather simple
starting point. Unlike Yoga masters, buildings systems are inflexible,
yet building conditions are highly dynamic. Circumstances change as
frequently as hourly, but as much so over their usable lives of 40+
years. That’s because current building systems are a bit like roads.
Once you lay them, they don’t and can’t change very much without a
major amount of investment and effort. And just like upgrading your
local freeway, there is always going to be a major question as to who
pays for the upgrade?
How does being inflexible lead to being
uncomfortable, expensive and inefficient? Building systems are made up
of programs that tell equipment to turn on and off based on inputs from
sensors, schedules set in software and control loops programmed in
logic controllers. These programs are based on assumptions about the
building occupancy, about its uses, about outside weather conditions,
engineering standards and best practices and the expected operational
behavior of the equipment providing lighting, heating and cooling
services. Assumptions that are defined when the building is first built.
Those assumptions are then coded into controllers statically; the same
way roads are planned around the communities they serve.
But what happens when the neighborhood changes?
Just like that new residential development clogs your freeway offramp
at rush hour, a lot has probably changed since your building was
designed 30+ years ago. First, everyone got computers, and there were
open floor plans, endless stand-up conference room meetings, a surge in
equal opportunity changed the workforce, LED lighting, hoteling and
dare way say climate change. Yet, very little has changed about the way
building systems are designed, engineered, installed and operated.
Why has so little changed about the way building
systems are designed and engineered, installed and operated? Is it
because of technology, or something else? These are the precise
questions that our recent discussion on how technology, specifically
wireless technology and open software systems are going to generate a
sea change in the building industry in the very near future.
Let’s leave this one aside and go back to
the original question for a minute. If the reason for these hugely
underperforming assets is an issue of inflexibility, the inability to
adapt to new and changing conditions, the same way streets are not very
adaptable to new developments in your local neighborhood, can current
technology solve this? Turning back the clock to one of my favorite
childhood cartoons, the Jetsons, we can see a clear illustration of how
technology will solve this issue of building system flexibility. In the
Jetsons everyone has a flying
car. It doesn’t matter how high your residence is or where you work
in relation to where you live. Traffic can be rerouted along any
infinite number of skyways. You can go anywhere and get anywhere at any
time. With wireless technology, the clear answer is yes!
This is almost a perfect analogy in the
sense that the data needed by building control systems, from sensor
readings to controller instructions is like your car (be it a flying
one or a conventional one). In today’s buildings you are stuck on
today’s roads. On the ground on a road that can’t be changed. You have
a finite number of on-ramps and off-ramps to go between neighborhoods
and there most certainly isn’t a direct line between point A and B,
leading to congestion, slow traffic and a limited number of places you
could go at any given moment.
You will be much more likely to shop at
your neighborhood market or eat in a nearby restaurant, than drive
halfway across town to that hot new gastropub. This is like the
Programmable Controller (PLC) with wired sensor inputs. You will take
the available options that are nearby, even if they are not the best
options to do the job. Worse, if you wanted to build a new development,
you would have to build it next to an existing offramp. Even if that
offramp is only available in a less than desirable neighborhood. In
other words, adding new sensors to existing wired controllers is
extremely challenging, and the result will be less than desirable since
inputs are likely to be located someplace irrelevant, or end up blowing
out ROI from the high cost of install labor to run wires.
In the Jetsons version you have a flying
car and there is no restriction. You could build a new development
ANYWHERE. Because the transportation system is not fixed there is no
limits to what can be added in the future. Traffic moves quickly and
smoothly, all the time. You can get places much faster than before. You
could eat from whatever restaurant or buy from whatever market you
want, whenever you want, with minimal added inconvenience. This is the
wireless way, where adding new sensors can be done at any time, any
place and with almost no installation labor cost. The result is a
flexible building. Even better, is an infinite number of software
applications, everything from tenant engagement, fault detection,
maintenance, security, energy management, interactive grid systems and
more that can be plugged in at
will.
With this new model is no more need to lock
in a vertical software platform that might also not adapt with the
building over time as software and hardware systems are separated
completely and no longer interdependent. There are currently quite a few hardware
agnostic building management platforms with API integrations enabling
this model such as: Swarm Neuro’s Sentinll from the U.K., Envio Systems
in Germany, Synchronoss Technologies in the U.S. and SenSING from
Singapore.
This scenario clearly describes the
difference between existing wired networks and the current discussion
around Wireless Ways. Wired networks, no matter whether they open
communication protocols like I.P. or BACnet, are still just like your
regular roads. Wireless networks on the other hand are like the flying
cars of the Jetsons, the data is free to go wherever it needs, grow and
expand. The adoption of wireless inputs and outputs which can be
changed over time and do not require individual programming, but can be
programmed and controlled remotely from centralized software. This
answers the core problem and makes your building as flexible as Babba
Yogi.
Read Part 2 - "Removing the Umbilical Cord between Controllers and Sensors"
About the Author
Phillip
Kopp is a technology co-founder who fell into the world of building
automation and energy efficiency over 20 years ago starting the first
totally wireless RF sensor company for hotel guestroom automation, sold
to the Somfy Group in 2009. He has since built or sold three other
companies in financial technology and SaaS and has contributed to over
15 US Patents. Phillip is currently the CEO of Conectric Networks,
whose goal is to install billions of wireless sensors into buildings,
AI enabling to develop a massive virtual grid. Reducing 20% of global
energy consumption and paving the way to a safer, more productive and
healthier future.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]