December 2017 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
The Future of BAS: A Year Later
For this year-end, I’d like to look at my current vision for the future of BAS over the longer-term. |
Ira Goldschmidt, P.E., LEEDŽAP December Issue -
BAS Column
|
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Another
year has passed for me as an avid observer and designer of BAS.
These columns have generally focused on the present and near-term
future, good or bad, along with how this has been influenced by the
past. For this year-end, I’d like to look at my current vision
for the future of BAS over the longer-term. While pondering this
subject, I found it interesting that, while my vision has changed over
the year, the information that I am basing this on has not changed by
very much. Let’s hope this means that I am homing in on a more
accurate vision of the future of BAS.
Controls/BAS Design & Programming & Diagnostics
January’s column discussed the importance of ASHRAE Guideline 36P’s
efforts to develop industry-standard sequences and point lists.
However, a related DOE effort is working on the use of the Guideline
36P’s sequences as a high-level language that would be unambiguously
translated into the machine language for download into BAS
controllers. These two developments together will greatly improve
the quality/consistency of BAS design, while substantially reducing the
effort required to both develop and implement the sequences.
Also recently
discussed in a column was the success of Facility Analytics software
and the emerging trend of incorporating analytics diagnostics at the
BAS level. This latter use of diagnostics will greatly improve
the effectiveness of BAS control and maintenance.
BAS as the Hub of Integration
BASs continue to be integrated with an ever-increasing variety of other
mechanical/electrical systems. Typically the BAS acts as the
client in this integration, or, in other words, as the hub for building
integration. This trend will continue since BASs are
well-equipped to handle the high levels of integration needed to help
buildings and building personnel operate more efficiently, and
participate in “intelligent buildings.” However, the extent to
which future BASs are successful as the “hub of integration” will
depend on how the future develops for some other important BAS-related
issues, as is discussed next.
Protocols
The issue of protocols is no longer about BACnet vs. LonWorks vs.
Modbus. BACnet is clearly the dominant BAS protocol with Modbus a
necessary evil when integrating with equipment with stronger roots in
the industrial world (e.g., electrical equipment). The future for
BASs acting as a hub of integration will instead focus on the
improvement of their web services capabilities. Web services is
not a protocol per se but instead a technique for developing custom
IP-based integration using the web-based XML protocol for messaging
encoding, and various other protocols for message transport (e.g.,
HTTP) and applications (i.e., SOAP). BAS web services
toolkits will develop further so that web-based integration using the
variety of techniques available can become a simpler and more common
task.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Architecture
It is becoming clearer by the day that IP will become the exclusive
communications data link technology for BAS. The next generation
of BAS terminal controllers will use IP instead of EIA-485 (typically
via BACnet MS/TP). This is the first step needed for BASs to
become a more-legitimate part of the “Internet of Things” (aka
“IoT”). Another important step will be the growth in the use of
wireless communications for terminal controls, which will also have the
added benefit of simplifying terminal controls’ installation,
especially in retrofit situations. And finally we will see the
emergence of IoT-like BAS devices; namely, that field devices (e.g.,
sensors, actuators, etc.) will communicate via IP (rather than via
analog point signaling). A BASs ability to manage its own IoT
devices will further its “hub of integration” capabilities with the
growing list of other building infrastructure IoT devices (e.g.,
Schneider’s “NetBotz” and other similar products).
My Only Big Concern
The double-edged sword of this BAS future is that improvements in the
security of BAS user access and communications messaging needs to keep
pace with BAS growth as the “hub of integration”…not a simple matter!
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]