July 2009 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Intelligent Buildings talk to the Smart Grid
Last month, the National Institute for standards and
Technology (NIST) unveiled the Interim Smart Grid Interoperability Roadmap.
(http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid/)
The roadmap defines the smart grid and how it interacts with is smart end
nodes. |
Toby Considine |
Intelligent buildings filled with clever devices and intelligent systems will negotiate with the grid and with their occupants to provide new models for reliable power. The benefits to the grid will come from coordinating supply and demand using economic signals. The benefits to the buildings will be increased value by providing higher levels of amenities to their tenants and inhabitants for lower cost. The benefits to the tenants and occupants will be better services at the same or lower costs and more autonomy as they separate from grid dependency. The benefit to the clever devices will be longer life and more reliable operations as we eliminate the power shocks that assail them now.
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
The benefits to building owners will be economic
models that offer incentives to pay for improved equipment. The benefit to
building integrators will be national markets based on common signals from the
grid, allowing them to provide more services to those owners for less. The
benefit to ventures and technology development will be the entry of all those
building owners into the markets for generation and storage; those owners will
offer a shorter sales cycle and more openness to innovation than ever will the
utilities.
This requires a small simple model for interactions. To create this model, we
must think clearly about the business process of each of these participants.
Today, we have the virtual company in every niche of our economy. UPS and FedEx
offer logistics services that are part of the internal processes of thousands of
companies. Tomorrow we will have virtual energy services companies as well,
assembled from the services offered by a community more numerous and diverse
than today.
Each building will communicate with the grid by two services: the metering
service and the energy management service (EMS). Whether these two services are
collocated on the same device is an engineering decision that does not change
the model.
The metering service (which does not necessarily mean the meter) will provide
live and interval measurement of energy flows into and out of the building. This
service will be symmetrical; both the supplier and the consumer will be able to
see the same information at the same time. The meter service will also be the
end-point of the energy distribution control system, providing telemetry to
enhance customer service and speed downtime recognition.
The EMS will be the focus of smart grid interactions. On the outside, the EMS
will manage the business negotiations for each building. On the outside of the
building, the EMS will be the locus of energy market operations. Buying,
selling, and price decisions will flow to and from the outside of the EMS.
On the inside of the EMS, developers and integrators will build applications to
manage moment by moment energy use. The energy management applications will
respond to the needs of the Industry, Office, or Home. The EMS will inform them
of market negotiations on the outside. They will catalogue the devices and
systems inside the building. They will marshal potential responses the smart
grid market signals. They will share these responses with the EMS agent to
inform its negotiations in energy markets.
The EMS may be able to relay energy management services to external parties.
Businesses and homes may choose to out-source their energy management; the EMS
will support this. Some utilities will mandate, as they do today, that accepting
their energy management services is a condition of participating in certain
programs. Some utilities will offer this outsourced energy management to their
customers as an option, reaching into unregulated markets for services to their
existing customers. If the smart grid standards develop properly, this will
validate the third party energy management market, opening it up for companies
that understand the customer and the building better.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
The roadmap aims for symmetry at each interface. Symmetry at the EMS means that
the market participant on the outside of the interface might be the market maker
n the inside. Any significant deployment of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs)
will force regulatory commissions to ease the restrictions on the re-sale of
electricity. A re-charging center has a whole new energy market inside, with an
EMS for each “pump”. This could be the wedge for retail markets for energy.
The educational campus, office park, and military base each has many buildings,
each with their own EMS. Even office buildings may have an EMS in front of each
tenant. Between the EMS at the edge of the grid, and each EMS below, there is
room for a whole new energy market. I think such markets will prove more
important to the development of distributed generation and storage than will
sales back to the grid.
Distributed generation and distributed storage are important aspects of the
smart grid. The EMS must be able to marshal and generation and storage the
building side to respond to market signals from the grid. If these resources are
inside a building, then there can be a micro-market inside that building. On the
base or campus microgrid, these resources may be directly attached, external to
the buildings. In either case, the messages and market operations on the client
side of the EMS should be the same as those on the outside.
The smart grid roadmap cites loose coupling, layered architectures, composition,
and symmetry as critical design values. The EMS as defined above uses loose
coupling and avoids direct control. Symmetry enables us to define the same
services on either side of the EMS, and for the meters to report net use and net
supply identically. Layering lets the conversation above proceed without ever
mentioning data paths or transport protocols; it works the same whether the EMS
is separately attached to the internet, or bound to the meter and communicating
over utility infrastructure. Composition lets price and supply and value flow
through multiple domains.
Smart Building professionals should watch the development of the EMS, and
consider what new value we can deliver once we define the interfaces. The
external EMS interface is being defined OASIS in the Energy Interoperability
Technical Committee and in the just forming Energy Market Information Exchange.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]