June 2011 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
How Far We’ve Come
you can see readily observe the “state of the art” from the 1970’s and 1980’s in many existing buildings |
Paul Ehrlich, Ira
Goldschmidt
& Angela Lewis
|
Often many of us (including the authors of this column) lament on the
sad state of affairs of controls. Why are designing controls so
hard? Why don’t systems work the without continued
commissioning? How come the industry isn’t delivering better
projects? But it is sometimes valuable to step back and look at
the incredible progress we have made as an industry over the last 20
years. To go back in time you don’t need a time machine, or even
a good recollection for history, you can see readily observe the “state
of the art” from the 1970’s and 1980’s in many existing buildings which
are continuing to operate, stopped in time, in the same method that
they were installed so many years ago. Here are a few key areas
where we have made significant progress over the last 20 years:
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Training |
Links |
Software |
Subscribe |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
VAV Box Control:
The accurate control of a variable air volume (VAV) terminal requires
proper measurement of both zone temperature and the ability to use it
to reset airflow. Early VAV box controls often did not provide
the ability to measure airflow and provided pressure dependent
control. These systems result in variations in airflow as the
system static pressure varies and rarely result in either good comfort
or consistent ventilation. A step up from pressure dependent
control was the mechanical volume regulator, followed closely by the
pneumatic and analog electronic volume regulator. Both concepts
can work, if rigorously maintained, but in reality are rarely operating
properly providing improper airflow. These early devices also do
not provide the ability to have multiple flow minimums or to provide
any feedback to the operator. The end result of these old
solutions is challenges with comfort, ventilation, and energy
efficiency. DDC controls are able to solve all of these problems
and to readily support optimization concepts including zone based
scheduling and static pressure reset, which is not possible with other
technologies.
Fan Control:
Attempting to control air handler capacity with the use of inlet guide
vanes, cones, or discharge dampers is an effective method to reduce
duct static pressure. However it has little impact on reducing
fan energy usage, and we are finding cases were this fan energy is
causing significant heating during low airflow. Today the use of
variable frequency drives provides a cost effective solution for fan
(and pump) modulation which is both more effective and also results in
significant energy savings. Drives provide added benefits
including the ability to meter energy usage of key equipment for just
the cost of integration.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Economizer Control:
On older buildings we frequently find that economizers are not
utilized. When they are used, it is at best, a dry bulb
changeover. While this is a good strategy it tends to run the
economizer for fewer hours then may be applicable, resulting in wasted
energy. Deploying and enthalpy or wet bulb economizer is
available for little cost with most DDC systems, resulting in improved
efficiency and performance.
These three examples are just a few of the many improvements, which are
available for control systems. The good news is that all of these
are readily achievable today, using the current generation of BAS and
provide attractive opportunities for upgrade. Moving to more
efficient control provides benefits both in terms of more energy
efficient operations as well as improved ventilation, comfort, and
operational efficiency.
About the Authors
Paul and Ira first worked together on a series of ASHRAE projects including the BACnet committee and Guideline 13 – Specifying DDC Controls. The formation of Building Intelligence Group provided them the ability to work together professionally providing assistance to owners with the planning, design and development of Intelligent Building Systems. Building Intelligence Group provides services for clients worldwide including leading Universities, Corporations, and Developers. More information can be found at www.buildingintelligencegroup.com We also invite you to contact us directly at Paul@buildingintelligencegroup.com or ira@buildingintelligencegroup.com
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]