March 2021 |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Building Automation and AI? Set the data free. Provide Meaning. And let’s go! |
|
Articles |
Interviews |
Releases |
New Products |
Reviews |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Editorial |
Events |
Sponsors |
Site Search |
Newsletters |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Archives |
Past Issues |
Home |
Editors |
eDucation |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
Links |
Software |
[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
A dicussion between our contributing editor Nicolas Waern and Ken Sinclair
“Wherever
there’s complexity, there’s room for AI to help make it easier. Agree?
Disagree?”
Hi Nicolas, how are things going on? I see that you are really pushing
the boundaries of automated buildings, and talking about 3D printing, energy,
railways, national digital twins, and other things. Are you leaving the fold?
It’s more
that I have felt a need to “go beyond buildings for real, to come back to the
real-estate industry armed with the knowledge that we need to have”, like I
said at the beginning of the year. I think that’s the only way to
learn, and to understand what others are doing in the industrial space, or even
healthcare. Hospitals for instance are a part of healthcare too, so that space
is very interesting from a Building Automation, indoor Air Quality perspective.
I will
record a session with the CTO from Foghorn tomorrow, Sastry Malladi, which will be very interesting.
They have been on my radar for 5 years now and I know they have a great
event-driven infrastructure that should scale well.
It is not
so much that I am leaving the Real-Estate realm, but things are going great and
I am learning a lot. Working in construction the last couple of years have led
me to understand the challenges that come from a fragmented industry, and most
importantly what to do about them. I am in fantastic discussions with people in
a lot of different industries and that is really helping me evolve. I’m having
discussions about Digital Twin related strategies in natural resources,
manufacturing, healthcare, sustainability purposes, construction and of course
also infrastructure and real estate. Real estate has its place in the world,
but I’m equally interested in the contextual intelligence of things to better
help partners and customers.
Okay, so maybe instead of Location, Location Location, you are saying
that it’s more about Context, Context Context? Fascinating. But is there any
method to the madness?
Any method
to the madness? Well, yes and no. I don’t save any energy for the swim back to
shore, so I’m constantly out there in the deep waters. But most recently I’ve
taken the lead for interoperable Digital Twins in Manufacturing, as well as the
European lead for the Infrastructure Working group at the Digital Twin
Consortium. So, if there are people in Europe (or elsewhere) and want to know
more about what the concept of Digital Twins can do for infrastructure, just
reach out to me and join a session as a guest!
Digital Twins is definitely the new hype. I see it everywhere these days
and I heard that some people even say that all buildings will have a digital
twin in the future. Do you agree?
iISAČ - Interoperability
solutions for public administrations, businesses and citizens
I really don’t agree with that statement at
all. Buildings will definitely not have a digital twin in the future. They will
have hundreds of Digital Twins in the future! The OEMs will have digital twins
of their products and there will be digital twins of complete assets, part of
assets, and individual components of the HVAC realm as a whole. The buildings
themselves need to be part of the Smart Grid Digtial Twin and the Smart City
Digital Twin which both consists of hundreds if not thousands of Digital Twins.
And the owners will probably have a Digital Twin with data built from other
interoperable Digital Twins. Knowing this, and also the challenges that exists
already with data-integration, puts even more emphasis on the importance of
interoperable Digital Twins, and semantic interoperability as a whole.
I like the framework
from ISAČ - which partly depicts the challenges in the space, and even more so
on the Organizational Interoperability challenges and the legal
interoperability challenges that will appear when data will be shared to a
greater extent. There will be a lot of
complexity before we can make it simple I think, but that’s also where AI,
Digital Twins, and other more modern technologies can help out.
The lack of
organizational Interoperability and industry interoperability, obsolete channel
systems, constant blame game on the past and focusing on problems, instead of
highlighting great solutions are major reasons why the industry is not moving
ahead.
I say, set
the data free. Provide meaning. And let's go. That shouldn’t be that hard,
should it?
Interesting… yes, technology is never the real problem. Saying that, what
are your thoughts on AI and Building Automation?
It might be
interesting to hear what 50 other professionals have to say about it
here in this post about Building Automation and AI?
The LinkedIn post was
actually a re-post of an article I wrote two years ago, that got a born again
connected via my network. It’s been seen by more than 10 000 people and
growing, so I strongly advice people to go in, like and comment and add to the
discussion.
“🔨“All we have to do is control three variables (flow,
temperature, and pressure) in two types of media (fluid or air) using four
pieces of equipment (valves, pumps, fans, and dampers). The logic is very easy
to arrange. The sequences of operation may not take long to write. But it’s the
variables of all the dependencies and the physics around it which makes it
extremely easy to wreck any setup. And also extremely difficult to get the full
perspective. It also helps highlight why A.I. has such great potential in
helping radically improve the way we commission and optimize the built
environment.” - James Cheesewright
I have some
up-to date thoughts on this which I will post on the Beyond Buildings Podcast & Newsletter soon. That will be more inspired by
how deep digital twins work in the Autonomous Vehicle industry as well as how
McLaren and F1 teams solve problems and what companies like Astra Zeneca, and
Oil & Gas platforms do with AI.
Linkedin
is an amazing platform to share and get knowledge, that’s for sure. What else
have you been talking about lately? And what will your next podcast be about
for Beyond Buildings? And to the most important question, when should we do a
session?! Are you scared that I will know more than you?
We need to
get you on the show. You are the almighty father of this industry so I don’t
have a great answer as to why you haven’t been on it yet. And I think we both
know that you have forgotten more about this industry that I will ever get to
know! But I got 8 episodes in the pipeline that I need to get out first so…
we’ll see! I’ll figure something out.
I just read
this great article from Steve Fey where I really liked this quote and the high-level
view from the top.
“Porting IT security technology and practices to address OT security will
not result in a more secure OT environment.” Why is this the case?
I think
there’s also a need to take into account other attack surfaces, and also
something related to Engineering Technology not limited to the world of BAS/BMS
but also to that of the rest of the building. IT/OT/IoT/ET conversion. But
great read. And I would love to hear more about what role Totem plays in this
and where they stop and start, due to the need for interoperable systems/people
to work together.
And perhaps
one of the most insightful comments that I’ve ever read in my life comes from
Joel Bender at Cornell University. Also a titan in the industry, who will be on
the Beyond Buildings Podcast soon talking about data-integration and semantic
interoperability together with Terry Herr and Eric Oscar Wallin from Real Estate Core. Joel was saying what everyone
else should be saying about BACnet, and the success of having such an
interoperable platform to stand on.
“…In one sense that speaks to its success because
people are more interested in the applications that are using BACnet rather
than how it works, and that’s how it should be.” Joel Bender, Cornell
Again, Joel
Bender, thanks for this comment. I think that BACnet and BACnet/SC when
leveraged correctly together with a proper security strategy is much better
than not having it at all.
I remember
the security session at the AHRexpo some years ago when the incredible Anto Budiardjo got everyone up at 7AM and I was
jetlagged into oblivion. There it was clearly stated that BACnet/SC only did as
much, and NIST frameworks, Tosibox, Totem, and many other solutions and
applications have to also work together in an Interoperable way. The technical
Interoperability that BACnet brings to the table is like you say, under
appreciated. Semantic Interoperability is now being "solved" with
Brick, DTDL, Rec, haystack, GBO, and others.
I posted
about the topic of BACnet and standards here:
What's the definition of a successful
standard?
With some great comments from the network.
The post
above was based on the post below from the all-knowing integration expert Andrew Rodgers who’s “Bringing open technology solutions
to secure cyber physical systems.
Open vs Interoperable
Great discussion about BACnet/SC, open, and interoperability and the value that
BACnet brings.
Potential of Digital Twins and running
what if scenarios based on material usage (copper)
The need to use ALL technologies of
the Building Buzz hype cycle to stay ahead of the game
I’ve been
working with Data Centers more and more, as well as connectivity strategies for
Airports, and looking into Construction Disruption with the help of a handful
of players in the industry. And much more…
So what you are saying is that if people are not following you on
Linkedin, they should?! Any final thoughts for the readers? Any action you want
us to take?
Join the
Digital Twin Consortium for the Working Group in Infrastructure!!
If
companies want to know how to predict what the world will do, this is the place
to be.
To better
help my customers and partners, I decided to join The Digital Twin Consortium
and be part of all the working groups. I have taken the lead for the
Infrastructure Working Group in Europe and taking point for Interoperable
Lifecycle Digital Twins in Manufacturing. Please reach out if this is
interesting.
And
contributor to:
-
Healthcare, Natural Resources and Aerospace and Defense.
Digital
Twin Technology is a tool/concept that can be applied to any and all areas,
irrespective of Industry. The use cases differ but it's all the same, but
different. Digital Twins have the possibility to exponentially accelerate
Scale, Scope, and Learning, in a sustainable way and they can be of all sizes.
From the nitty-gritty Digital Twin of a nut, bolt, where it came from, how it's
been used, what material or make it comes from, to a Digital Twin of the entire
Supply Chain. It's of utmost importance that Digital Twins are interoperable
and that future stakeholders can derive value from them in a standardized way.
The Digital
Twin Consortium aims to be an influence and drive the adoption, use,
interoperability, and development of digital twin technology. They propel the
innovation of digital twin technology through consistent approaches and open-source
development and are committed to accelerating the market and guiding outcomes
for users. The goal of the consortium is to be The Authority in Digital Twin as
it relates to policy, security, interoperability, and overall development of digital
twins. The consortium will define the ecosystem, standards requirements,
architectures, open-source code, identify gaps, and publish statements and
opinions. This will be done in partnership between industry, academia, and
government in a collaborative open environment.
Any final final words?
Companies
are data rich, but information poor. And the future is already here, just
unevenly distributed. Let’s go Beyond Buildings and back, to transform this
industry to what it’s supposed to be. I for one predict that the whole industry
will be revamped by 2025. That’s a promise I made to one of the foremost
wine-experts and building automation experts in the world. I can’t let him down
which is why I need all the help I can get.
Thanks for allowing me to come on to www.automatedbuildings.com Ken. I, and the whole industry will
forever be in your debt, and the ones that were here before us.
If you want
to find out what the world is going to do a month, a year, a decade from now
and how it might benefit you or anyone you know, reach out! I try to have a
holistic understanding of what is needed to stand out from competition, to
better advise on pros and cons, and be the strategy partner for both technology
and organization-advice in a Smart World Environment
(Construction/Industry/Smart Buildings and Cities).
Please
reach out if you have any questions and comments or if you have any ideas on
what I should write next!
Sincerely,
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[Click Banner To Learn More]
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]